vk6flab

joined 1 year ago
[–] vk6flab@lemmy.radio 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

From your description it's unclear, does this also block CSAM that's physically on your infrastructure, or just any links to external content?

CloudFlare is currently attempting to block LLM bots and doing a shit job at it. I'm guessing that any CSAM blocking would be incomplete at best.

What happens if some "gets through", or if non-CSAM content is blocked, both materially, as-in, what happens, and, what are the legal implications, since I doubt that CloudFlare would ever assume liability for content on your infrastructure.

Edit: I thought I'd also point out that this is not the only type of content that could get you into a legal black hole. For example, if a post was made that circumvented a legal ruling, say when a court in Melbourne, Australia, makes a suppression order that someone breaches. Or if defamatory content was published, etc.

[–] vk6flab@lemmy.radio 7 points 1 day ago

I am not a lawyer and I don't play one on the internet.

To my understanding the process is only prevented by controlling who can have an account on your instance.

That said, it's not clear to me how federated content is legally considered.

The only thing I can think of is running a bot on your instance that uses the API of a service such as what you mention to deal with such images.

Your post is the first one I've seen recently that is even describing the issue of liability, but it's in my opinion the single biggest concern that exists in the fediverse and it's why I've never hosted my own instance.

[–] vk6flab@lemmy.radio 1 points 1 day ago

Unfortunately that doesn't work.

[–] vk6flab@lemmy.radio 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)

This is getting fucking tiresome. Now we're stopping humans who browse anonymously from reading content, what's next, block all humans and only let LLM bots access your site?

[–] vk6flab@lemmy.radio 12 points 1 day ago

One place to look is 80000hours.org.

 

What's the corporate phrase again?

"We're sorry for any inconvenience this has caused our valued customers."

[–] vk6flab@lemmy.radio 3 points 4 days ago

I don't keep a browser history at all, but my most recent visit was to:

[–] vk6flab@lemmy.radio 26 points 5 days ago

Or my favourite passive aggressive attempt by Admiral's anti-ad-blocking "technology":

"Continue without supporting"

[–] vk6flab@lemmy.radio 50 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (6 children)

This article doesn't at all explain what actually happens. There's a hand wavey description including PowerShell scripts and the clipboard, but it doesn't indicate how the code gets executed.

The article talks about a complex and sophisticated attack, but I don't see any evidence of that assertion.

Also, given that it's talking about PowerShell, I'm going to guess that this affects Windows only.

Finally, there's no source links, no CVE allocation, no indication what the URL looks like.

I'm going with deep scepticism about this report unless more information comes to hand.

[–] vk6flab@lemmy.radio 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Can't wait to see the Australian government completely ignore this rather than apply it to the fossil fuel lobby that's currently running the show.

[–] vk6flab@lemmy.radio 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Ashland VA has a recurring problem where non-Tesla drivers turn onto the tracks, there's dozens of cases.

Virtual Railfan YouTube channel will give you most of them.

Makes you wonder if Tesla used YouTube as a training tool.

[–] vk6flab@lemmy.radio 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I would be extremely careful, since it failed for a reason and you were very lucky not to set the house on fire, which looks like it came pretty close to.

[–] vk6flab@lemmy.radio 5 points 2 weeks ago

There's a whole range of cli tools to extract and query structured data like that, but you might consider loading it into something like sqlite3 and treating it as a database because those formats are really not intended for queries, they're designed for sharing data.

 

You can't wear one leg each from two different pairs of jeans and go about your daily business, like you could for two pairs of shoes or socks, each of which is independent from the other, albeit left and right specific in various cases.

The same is true for a pair of reading glasses.

Whilst it's obvious that both glasses and jeans (and pants in general) are referred to as being a pair, due to the two legs and eyes aspect, we don't refer to a jumper as a pair of jumpers, unless there's physically four sleeves attached to two bodies.

Why is that and where else does this occur?

 

Death is inevitable but we still seem flummoxed by it happening. We have all kinds of End of Life policies and procedures which do everything possible to make life difficult for those left behind.

Our language is around loss and unexpected, and grief and being bereft.

Why do we make Death so hard to process in our community and what can we do to normalise it across society?

 
 

What kind of world are the Orange and his puppet master billionaires building?

Are we headed for slavery, extinction, the matrix or some other post apocalyptic future?

How do these despots think that food arrives?

At the moment it seems they're hell bent on global destruction.

 

Just in case you're like me living under the mistaken belief that the only Rapid Antigen Tests available are for COVID.

view more: next ›