Yes, the United States Schutzstaffel.
vonxylofon
joined 11 months ago
I still fail to see how people expect LLMs to reason. It's like expecting a slice of pizza to reason. That's just not what it does.
Although Porsche managed to make a car with the engine in the most idiotic place win literally everything on Earth, so I guess I'm leaving a little possibility that the slice of pizza will outreason GPT 4.
Join us. Thrive.
Poop dessert fork will have to do, then.
You don't have a poop knife?
This guy is an absolute lunatic.
"Gimme all of the world's money several times over for this fancy T9 that I'm playing with."
If someone wrote a cartoon villain using his quotes, it would be dismissed as unbelievable and rubbish.
Easily Ubuntu. Despite its general wonkiness and kind of a shit attitude towards upstreams, at least they're not shoving mandatory tracking into all of your orifices, and aren't integrating AI into everything because fuck you, you'll like it.
It's kind of a big deal if you can't legally do this (and as it happens, you can't where they did it) by implying you can circumvent the law this way.
Huh, never thought of that that way.
It's not like it's not been rolling out features and opting people in without telling them...
This could be any game, and anyway, does this sub get so much traffic it's a problem?
view more: next ›
With a clear set of criteria, you can easily make this argument that the designer of the discrimination system is culpable because they input discriminatory criteria into the system, I'm with you there.
However, with AI, it may easily happen that unforeseen discriminatory behaviour emerges, in which case I would argue it is indistinguishable in practice whether a computer is purely evaluating criteria or making a decision on its own for the purposes of calling decisions discriminatory.
The same happens e.g. when discovering new proteins using AI. AI comes up with a protein, you confirm it's better than the previous one, victory. There may be a better one, but that's not really a concern here. Same can't be said when targetting a group of people with repressive measures.