what does her expression tell you about her character?
vrighter
The original's smile communicates much more stuff than the eyes on the face that looks like it's completely bored.
Trying to "communicate with her eyes" is exactly what makes the poster bad.
To whom it may concern,
MURDER! MURDER! MURDER!
Yours truly, Maurice Moss
no, it wouldn't. Because the car is not filled with aerosolized explodey-gas, but just flammable liquid contained in a robust tank. it is not explosive. It can catch fire, but not simply from impact. You'd need a hole in the tank lower than the current fuel level and an external ignition source. Even if you shoot the gas tank directly, it will not explode. It is physically impossible for it to explode.
Puncture one of an electric car's cells, and it sets off a chain reaction. The whole car very quickly goes up in flames.
extensions are not supported in gnome. gnome devs do not care in the slightest if they break them whenever.
a > 30000 vehicle that won't be available for a decade
matrix multiplications. lots and lots of matrix multiplications. What gpus are good at already
the exact same intended use case, in fact
not really. A lot of techniques have been known for decades. What we didn't have back then was insane compute power.
and there's the turing award for computer science.
and physicists use tools from math, so fields medals should be awarded to physicists.
yeah, so that means that it's not incremental improvement on what we have that we need. That will get us nowhere. We need a (as yet unknown) completely different approach. Which is the opposite of incremental improvement.
but... she wasn't assaulted...