vsis

joined 1 year ago
[โ€“] vsis@feddit.cl 5 points 2 months ago

me before reading this: I know the basics of CSS.

me after reading this: I know nothing about CSS.

[โ€“] vsis@feddit.cl 2 points 2 months ago

git is already a decentralized version control software. Your local git repos are mirrors by themselves.

Put some git fetch in a server crontab, and you're done. You can access them via ssh if your user have permissions.

[โ€“] vsis@feddit.cl 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Everywhere, except India, it's about 3%.

With India the average is a bit more than 4%.

 

tl;dr - If a project has been forked or is a fork, you can bruteforce short commit id to see commits from other projects. It doesn't matter if those projects were deleted or made private.

[โ€“] vsis@feddit.cl 19 points 3 months ago (2 children)

My tomatoes: I don't have enough room in the pot. I'll just die.

Other people's tomatoes:

[โ€“] vsis@feddit.cl 2 points 3 months ago

target the largest market segment to gain the most conversions.

Windows market share is bigger in desktop only. In fact, is kinda sad that still there are serious institutions using Windows for non-desktop stuff. I hope this incident changes it.

the real difference is you need a few decades of linux experience to fix anything in a timely manner.

[ citation needed ] Probably you are meaning desktop again. Although troubleshooting Windows is not easy task neither, there are way more desktop users familiar with it.

The real thing is

    1. There is no single "linux" OS. There are lots of different OSes based on Linux kernel. And they are for servers, desktop, embedded systems, smartphones, etc.
    1. More important. Security is a process, not a product from a vendor. The root cause of this incident is that some institutions are seeing that you just buy "security", install it, and call it a day. No important stuff should auto-update. And no institution should auto-update lots of important stuff at the same time.

So, Linux is not really more secure. But is built in a culture where security is taken more seriously.

[โ€“] vsis@feddit.cl 2 points 4 months ago

Sorry, I can't hear you over the artillery noise.

[โ€“] vsis@feddit.cl 5 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

As a spanish/romance speaking person: ahahahah LOL!

Where do you thing "gratis" and "libre" come from?

[โ€“] vsis@feddit.cl 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Wait.

Does Portainer ask your email? I haven't used it in years. I though it was just a container that you run, with mounted docker socket, and that's it.

Is it now doing some "telemetry" and sending user data, like email, to their servers? If so, I'm glad I'm not using that anymore.

[โ€“] vsis@feddit.cl 4 points 4 months ago

Well, thank you for pointing me to this project. Didn't know about it. I've just built it. So, the part of I'll do my best to see what can I help with applies here to.

[โ€“] vsis@feddit.cl 7 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

The project management may have some obvious problems (jOin dIsc0Rd sErVEr; w0rD "thEy" t0o p0liTicAl). But we really need an alternative to browsers funded by Google (Chrome and Firefox).

So I'll do my best to actually build from sources and see what can I help with. Attacking the author is helping nobody.

And for the folks who are saying "wHy n0t rUst", you can always show me the (rust) code.

[โ€“] vsis@feddit.cl 8 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

VPS + VPN is the cheapest option I believe for the services. It doesn't have to be "elaborated".

You can port-forward public VPS ports to your private addresses/ports. If you don't want to use iptables you can use firewalld.

The only "but" will be latency. For gaming it won't perform as you may need.

[โ€“] vsis@feddit.cl 1 points 4 months ago

It's no longer open source. Big Deal in my books.

 

I want a centralized way to manage keys and secrets. And some service users with little privileges over a subset of the secrets. Ideally, a service user only should be able to read its own subset of secrets. So, let's say, if a container gets pwned it will only read its secrets and no more. It should be FOSS and self-hostable.

And a beautiful nice-to-have feature would be access log, to know who read what and when.

My only experience with something similar is Hashicorp Vault, but I don't want to be near any Hashicorp stuff ever again.

Do you know a FOSS alternative to Vault?

 

My laptop is working just fine. It's from 2018 and it has an NVME drive.

It has an EFI boot partition and other partition with LUKS and LVM on top of that.

Since this week I see these logs from time to time:

Mar 07 17:31:14 almendra kernel: pcieport 0000:00:1d.6: PCIe Bus Error: severity=Corrected, type=Physical Layer, (Receiver ID)
Mar 07 17:31:14 almendra kernel: pcieport 0000:00:1d.6:   device [8086:34b6] error status/mask=00000001/00002000
Mar 07 17:31:14 almendra kernel: pcieport 0000:00:1d.6:    [ 0] RxErr                  (First)
Mar 07 17:31:14 almendra kernel: pcieport 0000:00:1d.6: AER:   Error of this Agent is reported first
Mar 07 17:31:14 almendra kernel: nvme 0000:02:00.0: PCIe Bus Error: severity=Corrected, type=Physical Layer, (Receiver ID)
Mar 07 17:31:14 almendra kernel: nvme 0000:02:00.0:   device [8086:0975] error status/mask=00000001/00002000
Mar 07 17:31:14 almendra kernel: nvme 0000:02:00.0:    [ 0] RxErr                  (First)

The devices are:

$ lspci -vv | grep 1d.6
00:1d.6 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation Device 34b6 (rev 30) (prog-if 00 [Normal decode])

$ lspci -vv | grep 02:00.0
02:00.0 Non-Volatile memory controller: Intel Corporation Optane NVME SSD H10 with Solid State Storage [Teton Glacier] (prog-if 02 [NVM Express])

The laptop works like always, but I have the impression that the NVME drive is telling me something bad.

It happens from time to time:

$ journalctl --since yesterday | grep -c "nvme 0000:02:00.0: PCIe Bus Error: severity=Corrected, type=Physical"
9

Do you know what does it mean?

42
submitted 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) by vsis@feddit.cl to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world
 

Hello. Let's say I want to selfhost an email server (smtp + imap) that only will be used to receive email.

I only will send email internally (from my domain to my domain) and receive from 3rd parties.

Should I setup DKIM, DMARC, SPF and reverse IP lookup?

To be honest, I'm having a bit of hard time understanding the madness of email authentication. So I can't figure it out by myself if those mechanisms are needed in my case.

I haven't deployed anything, but probably will use Stalwart. It looks like it's easy to deploy. Is there any other beginner-friendly email service I should read about?

Thanks!

 

cross-posted from: https://feddit.cl/post/366747

I was reading this issue from LibreWolf project when I read that some of new GitLab users were asking to give credit card information.

I had no idea this was a thing. According to the forum it's a measure to avoid bots to use free CI workers time to mine shitcoins.

 

I was reading this issue from LibreWolf project when I read that some of new GitLab users were asking to give credit card information.

I had no idea this was a thing. According to the forum it's a measure to avoid bots to use free CI workers time to mine shitcoins.

 

cross-posted from: https://feddit.cl/post/246636

Un artesano toledano trabajando en una joya damasquinada.

view more: next โ€บ