witty_username

joined 10 months ago
[–] witty_username@feddit.nl 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I thought queue came from French

[–] witty_username@feddit.nl 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Ooh haven't read that. I really like forever war

[–] witty_username@feddit.nl 30 points 3 weeks ago

The problem isn't necessarily the tools we develop. The question is who do these tools empower.
If technological progress disproportionately empowers a minority and increases socioeconomic injustice, there is no true progress, merely increasingly elaborate repression and abuse

[–] witty_username@feddit.nl 7 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Person who forgot keys

[–] witty_username@feddit.nl 3 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Man I totally agree. I have an XZ2C running lineage but it isn't working correctly. Am going to try to flash it again, hopefully that helps.

At any rate, I haven't come across a satisfying explanation about the reason for the absence of small smartphones. I'm convinced that there is a market for it so why aren't any of the established companies producing them?
Is it a matter of profit? I.e. are the profit margins better for larger devices?
I don't expect it to be a battery capacity problem, since the trade off seems sensible to make.

[–] witty_username@feddit.nl 30 points 3 weeks ago

Isn't there an EU citizens initiative to ban large suvs and large pickup trucks yet?
I searched here but I can't find any:
https://citizens-initiative.europa.eu/find-initiative_en

[–] witty_username@feddit.nl 1 points 4 weeks ago

Sorry, fixed the typo

[–] witty_username@feddit.nl 1 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (2 children)

Lol no :p I'm not disagreeing with you, I'm saying that you haven't convincingly substantiated your claims.
I was mostly hoping to find direct evidence to support the claim that amylase pre-treated oat-water is more destabilizing to blood sugar levels than non pre-treated. I'm getting the impression that you don't know of any.
That is not to say that your claim is wrong, just that it is, at best, merely supported by indirect evidence.
Edit: typo

view more: next ›