xilona

joined 1 year ago
[โ€“] xilona@lemmy.ml 3 points 11 months ago

I agree. If every of us would do their homework right.

Doing my part.

[โ€“] xilona@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

๐Ÿ™‚ The world is full of qualified professionals nowadays mate! You are one of them for sure!

[โ€“] xilona@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Yup and then they move the spyware/malware/etc into a layer below where nobody knows what is inside...

How is your baseband modem in your smartphone doing, by the way?

[โ€“] xilona@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Can somebody explain me Proton in detail? ๐Ÿ˜‰

[โ€“] xilona@lemmy.ml -4 points 1 year ago (3 children)

And still I wonder why almost all public institutions use Micro$oft & Co...

Nothing to see here, Same BS, Laws that do nothing, See GDPR,

[โ€“] xilona@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

IMEIs are unique by design... Any existing device SHOULD have a unique IMEI. So when you use an older device IMEI should work perfectly.

[โ€“] xilona@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

Best advice! +1

[โ€“] xilona@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Yes you are correct!

But in our discussion it was implied/assumed a random UNIQUE IMEI or MAC address.

For example most of people have a pile of unused older phones which are NOT IN USE and you could use thoses IMEIs without issues.

[โ€“] xilona@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago (4 children)

No, there are no confusions. Changing the "id" like the MAC address or the IMEI has no impact on any system.

Its just like a new device joins a network.

For example, when a client device gets its IP from the dhcp server on a router, which allocates a random ip from a specific pool, it does not influence anything like ip packets routing...

The real issue is that it is forbiden, BECAUSE if you randomize it you do not have an unique id anymore to trace back a specific device...

Hope is more clear for you now!

[โ€“] xilona@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago

Well done mate!

view more: next โ€บ