yA3xAKQMbq

joined 1 year ago
[–] yA3xAKQMbq@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Well in those cases the UK highway code rule 66 says "Be aware of drivers behind you, and allow them to overtake (e.g. by moving into single file or stopping) when you feel it is safe to let them do so."

[–] yA3xAKQMbq@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

a) that road definitely is not with a speed limit over 50 and b) you cannot pass even a single bike here in a safe manner, in Germany for example it would be a misdemeanor to even try.

[–] yA3xAKQMbq@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago

Can you even imagine someone on a bike going "Nope! This is my lane! I have rights! Thou shall not pass!" while a fucking fire truck goes BRAAAAAAAAAH at +100 dB behind them? 😂

[–] yA3xAKQMbq@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago

What ever it is you're taking, you need to either take more or less of it. And you should see a mental health expert rather soon. Also, please do the world a favour and stay away from vehicles of any kind.

[–] yA3xAKQMbq@lemm.ee 10 points 1 year ago

Where do you see another vehicle "waiting to pass"? There's absolutely nothing in this picture telling you how much traffic there is, how wide the road is, etc. Nothing.

What can be seen in the picture, however, is a car that, no matter the speed, is tailgating way too close. Which is a misdemeanor in some countries.

[–] yA3xAKQMbq@lemm.ee 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Operative word here being "were".

There is no ambulance in this picture, nor do you know if the bikers are "blocking up the road".

Do you always make up stories about barking up imaginary trees in a fantasy forest?

[–] yA3xAKQMbq@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

Ooh, now it's not about money but "putting people in danger"! Okay.

Here's the British police telling you how you are wrong: https://www.tiktok.com/@georgescarmedia/video/7263078730241756448

[–] yA3xAKQMbq@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

And no one, absolutely nobody, has said otherwise.

[–] yA3xAKQMbq@lemm.ee 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Go shift your goalposts somewhere else. You said cyclists didn't pay for roads. You're wrong. Now leave, thx.

[–] yA3xAKQMbq@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Also to consider that the way the shops are build like that is because of cars not foot traffic.

Aah, yes, all the European cities which were built way before the car and look like that were built because of cars 🤡

[–] yA3xAKQMbq@lemm.ee 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

Right cuz cyclists are totally paying the road fees to keep the road maintained even they don't cause any damages at all. What was it called? Ah yes. Taxes

[–] yA3xAKQMbq@lemm.ee 28 points 1 year ago (4 children)

If there's only ten cars per hour you should have plenty of options to pass them ...

view more: ‹ prev next ›