zeca

joined 2 months ago
[–] zeca@lemmy.eco.br 3 points 5 days ago (2 children)

im not so sure the devs have fault in any of this though

[–] zeca@lemmy.eco.br 27 points 1 week ago (1 children)

there isnt so much incentive. No advertisement. Upvote counters behave weirdly in the fediverse (from what i can see).

[–] zeca@lemmy.eco.br 5 points 1 week ago

I feel like dogs tend to to give us the benefit of the doubt about everything, never jump to thinking we're crazy.

[–] zeca@lemmy.eco.br 3 points 2 weeks ago

i doubt the effort would be actually equal. dont know about ny, but where im from, the double standard is blatant

[–] zeca@lemmy.eco.br 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

reminds me of that film where someone puts LSD into the water of some military base. Then everyone chills and start rolling in the grass, smelling flowers or smt.

[–] zeca@lemmy.eco.br 6 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I see, so you see it not an actual state we may achieve, but rather the negation of present authorities and systems.

[–] zeca@lemmy.eco.br 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

So as long as an organization is truly democratic, it can be considered anarchist?

For example, if one person likes to make coca cola but as a side effect he pollutes a river that the rest of the group wants to keep clean. The group may decide democratically to force him to not make coca cola. I would call this a goverment-like organization, even though it does not need to have a leader to fulfill its goal.

[–] zeca@lemmy.eco.br 6 points 3 weeks ago (7 children)

excuse my ignorance, but ive always wondered this about anarchism: Seems to me that people gather and organize themselves to reach common goals. How can these organizations not become governments? is that actually possible?

[–] zeca@lemmy.eco.br 3 points 1 month ago

yes, the internet wasnt built on charity