this post was submitted on 01 Jul 2026
560 points (100.0% liked)

Games

49344 readers
2693 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Rules

1. Submissions have to be related to games

Video games, tabletop, or otherwise. Posts not related to games will be deleted.

This community is focused on games, of all kinds. Any news item or discussion should be related to gaming in some way.

2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

No bigotry, hardline stance. Try not to get too heated when entering into a discussion or debate.

We are here to talk and discuss about one of our passions, not fight or be exposed to hate. Posts or responses that are hateful will be deleted to keep the atmosphere good. If repeatedly violated, not only will the comment be deleted but a ban will be handed out as well. We judge each case individually.

3. No excessive self-promotion

Try to keep it to 10% self-promotion / 90% other stuff in your post history.

This is to prevent people from posting for the sole purpose of promoting their own website or social media account.

4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

This community is mostly for discussion and news. Remember to search for the thing you're submitting before posting to see if it's already been posted.

We want to keep the quality of posts high. Therefore, memes, funny videos, low-effort posts and reposts are not allowed. We prohibit giveaways because we cannot be sure that the person holding the giveaway will actually do what they promise.

5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

Make sure to mark your stuff or it may be removed.

No one wants to be spoiled. Therefore, always mark spoilers. Similarly mark NSFW, in case anyone is browsing in a public space or at work.

6. No linking to piracy

Don't share it here, there are other places to find it. Discussion of piracy is fine.

We don't want us moderators or the admins of lemmy.world to get in trouble for linking to piracy. Therefore, any link to piracy will be removed. Discussion of it is of course allowed.

Authorized Regular Threads

Related communities

PM a mod to add your own

Video games

Generic

Help and suggestions

By platform

By type

By games

Language specific

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CombatWombat@feddit.online 87 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Realistically, with half-finished games on launch and mandatory day one patches, this won't be a meaningful shift in how much you actually "own" your games, but dropping this 2 days after they deleted 550 movies that folks had bought and paid for and ostensibly "owned" from the ecosystem is a real bad look.

[–] mrfriki@lemmy.world 43 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (4 children)

The problem with discs vs. digital never was how much of the game you own or the fact that you can play the same disc 20 years down the road. It boils down to the fact that you can no longer sell the game you own after finishing it.

[–] Railcar8095@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Not only selling, but buying, lending or even gifting!

[–] mrfriki@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

That's correct, most of my collection on XboX 360 and PS4 comes from second hand games.

[–] Feyd@programming.dev 48 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Or even just lend it to a friend. When I was a kid everyone in my group would get a different game and share them. We barely would have been able to play anything if we didn't share

[–] atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works 25 points 2 days ago (1 children)

See, this is the real problem. Anybody with an MBA is going to look at your statement and think about all the money they didn’t get because they’re too fucking stupid to realize that you would not have bought more games if you had to buy multiple copies. It’s the same thing with like pirating music they used to talk about how much money they’ve lost, and I used to think no I just wouldn’t have bought that album. So they’ve spent all this time trying to figure out how to chase down dollars they never would’ve gotten to begin with.

[–] Feyd@programming.dev 6 points 2 days ago

Yeah the reality is I would have just read (more) books from the library and played fewer video games

[–] Katana314@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago

I don’t think reselling is the big issue to me; just ownership. Some high-guarantee method of both retaining and controlling the product in question, which is often failed by our technical measures and server checks.

I’m fine with digital, even when it prevents reselling. I’m just less fine with it when license holders have the right to say “No, I’m done!” and pull their side of the contract.

[–] flandish@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

yeah but the way they “release” games the disc is just a series of wget requests for patch files and if they take that endpoint down the disc is worthless.

[–] samus12345@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Yes, it's less than ideal, but still preferable to having NO way to sell or trade a license while the servers are still up. Games are becoming too big to fit on a single Bluray anyway.

[–] flandish@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago
[–] GoatSynagogue@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

They’re dropping this news now so people forget about it in a few days when they all pick up their pitchforks and go after Microsoft for the upcoming layoffs.

The funny thing is the main people going after MS will be people that want Xbox to die anyway, leaving Sony free to do things like this.

[–] bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works 9 points 2 days ago (2 children)

We used to finish games. No update bullshit. A game was done when it was done. Humans can do this shit. Capitalism erodes our skills and our brains.

Just look at crash on ps1. Amazing.

[–] atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Yes, but also no… For instance there were definitely bugs in Mario 64 that were corrected in later editions of Mario 64 like Mario 64DD and the one that came out on the DS. One very famous bug that’s been corrected is the ability to backwards long jump up the stairs in the upper section of the castle before having enough stars to climb the stairs.

Obviously these weren’t game breaking bugs in the same way that day one patches are fixing things, but it’s also not exactly correct to say it didn’t happen in the before time.

[–] bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 days ago

Right, it happened, but Usually they were small bugs.

I'm referring more to unnessecary updating every week . i hate that shit

[–] GoatSynagogue@lemmy.world -1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I would rather a game that is supported for years with new content, updates, and fixes over one that isn’t. This thinking that “games were done back in the olden days, now they’re not” is dumb. They were just smaller, and they often had lots of bugs that could never be fixed.

[–] bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Nah. I'll take a finished game with a few bugs over a "weekly update ".

Also, game updates aren't even bug fixes a lot of the time, its doing some idiotic menu reorganizing or adding a new loot box. Games dont need any of that. They just have to be good.

And also, your game that is "supported for years " with its weekly updates is dead in the water after 5 years often when its no longer "profitable " and with bugs still unfixed. So does it really make sense ?

Again, I can throw crash in my ps1 and play through it with 0 issue and 0 internet. Can The Crew do that? Can any game do that in 30 years? No.

[–] GoatSynagogue@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

So you are against updates just in principle lol. You’d rather games not get better because of a misguided idea that updates being a thing mean games aren’t “finished” at release.

You also seem to think that only online-only games get frequent updates. That’s not true. Take a game like vampire survivors for example. It must have had a hundred updates by now, and it’s a single player offline game (though they also recently added online multiplayer in a free update). That game will be playable in 30 years time too. Why wouldn’t it?

You are mistaking games that require a persistent online connection as “games that get updates”.

[–] bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works 0 points 23 hours ago

Basically yes, because many are unnecessary updates. I don't care about them. Its actually cringe for me when I open a game and see "gahhh NOW what did they fricken change ??". For many games, its usually not a good thing either, just from games I've played. Thats of course not always true. A bug fix here and there isnt the worst. But it rarely stops there.

"Constant updates " and "required online for single player " are often (usually) tied together. They can be separate yes, and those examples exist and are fine.

I still stand by the fact that there were millions of games made before constant internet and updates were a thing, and maaaaany of them are very good. I mean, I also hate when software devs think moving around all our menu buttons and shit (also introducing more bugs) and re releasing a product makes it "better" when it worked just fine for years. Its like they feel the need to change unnessesary shit, probably because the CEO told their boss it needs to be done so line go up. Who knows. Changing stuff for the sake of change does nothing.