this post was submitted on 01 Jul 2026
469 points (98.0% liked)

Electric Vehicles

2772 readers
701 users here now

Overview:

Electric Vehicles are a key part of our tomorrow and how we get there. If we can get all the fossil fuel vehicles off our roads, out of our seas and out of our skies, we'll have a much better environment. This community is where we discuss the various different vehicles and news stories regarding electric transportation.


Related communities:


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] bizarroland@lemmy.world 21 points 16 hours ago (4 children)

The company that can make an EV that gets you 100 miles range for $10,000 and can fit at least three people will become one of the dominant players.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 15 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

My cargo e-bike could do that, assuming you can carry an extra battery and the passengers are kids. And for a lot less than $10K, too.

[–] blarghly@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

Sure, but your cargo ebike cannot safely or efficiently travel on the highway, which is a requirement for many/most people looking to buy a car.

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 12 points 15 hours ago (4 children)

It's annoying how the world, especially North America, is designed around vehicles that "can fit at lest three people" but are most frequently driven by a single person.

I love my ebike, and don't own a car, but even for short trips things would be more convenient with a car. The roads are designed for cars. Parking is designed for cars. Laws protect cars far more than bikes.

Maybe that will change. What happened in the Netherlands since the 1970s gives me hope. But, right now it's sad how the switch away from the gas-powered car seems to be toward electric cars rather than bikes, ebikes and mass transit.

[–] NotJohnSmith@feddit.uk 3 points 3 hours ago

Car brain really is a thing. Here in the UK it seems to be considered a thing that if you can afford one, you have one.

I sold my car (my wife has and needs one to be fair) 4-5 yrs back. Tried to make an ebike work but it didn't fit my lifestyle so I bought an electric moped and it's handled everything I've thrown at it.

Traffic is no longer a thing so it saves me so much time not having to allow time for it, it's generally quicker/as quick as a car on all the trips I do, parking is easy and it's dirt cheap to run.

Not sure I'll ever buy a car again

[–] Etnaphele@lemmy.world 4 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

Additionally, Americans are typically fat and need even more radial maneuvering room. That’s why they find European cars cramped. The comments on cupholders in American car forums are very funny.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 5 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

I live in Atlanta, which ain't exactly the poster-child for bike-friendliness. But even here, at least in my part of town, it actually is getting to the point where short trips are genuinely more convenient on a bike. Dropping the kids off at school definitely is because I don't have to wait in line, and any destination downtown is best reached on a bike because I don't have to pay for parking. Going to the grocery store isn't quite better by bike, but the margin is close enough that I bike anyway.

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 3 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Parking is one of those things that could be improved for biking. I really hate most of the bike racks that most places use, and if you get a bad one it can take a significant amount of time to lock up your bike. And, a big reason why locking up a bike takes a while is that bike theft isn't really treated seriously. IMO if bike theft were taken more seriously you wouldn't need to make sure you had an excellent lock and had your front wheel secured, etc. Thieves would be much less willing to take the risk of stealing one, so a simple chain would be enough to discourage most thieves.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 5 points 14 hours ago

I feel like excessive parking for cars is a much worse problem than inadequate parking for bikes. But yes, parking for bikes could be better (and very easily, too).

[–] osaerisxero@kbin.melroy.org 5 points 15 hours ago

Any vehicle I have must fit at least 3 people, because at any time I must be able to move myself + the 2 kids. I could get a little 2-seater runabout for 90% of my driving (or maybe a motorcycle or something similar), but then I would have to have another vehicle, at additional license costs, interest costs, storage costs, and then have to guess which one I will need by the end of the day at the start, consistently every time. Because of this, every vehicle I own must be able to do every thing I can conceivably need to do in a given day.

From what I can tell, this condition exists for a plurality of drivers in the driving-centric parts of the US, and so became the standard because it's the minimum for those people.

[–] halcyoncmdr@piefed.social 4 points 12 hours ago

I think you vastly underestimate the number of people that believe they need 400+ mole range on their vehicle despite never leaving their city.

[–] BigTwerp@feddit.uk 6 points 15 hours ago

Here in the UK you can pick up a secondhand Tesla with 60% depleted battery with a guranteed 100 miles range for £8,000. Less than 10 years old and with less than 40k miles.

Obviously everyone will call you a cunt but it's possible.

[–] bluGill@fedia.io 3 points 16 hours ago

100 miles when it is -25 or colder. Otherwise there are too many variables. Most days 100 miles is more than most people drive however most people I know often have a day where they do that much.