this post was submitted on 06 Jul 2026
-11 points (29.6% liked)

No Stupid Questions

48806 readers
826 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here. This includes using AI responses and summaries.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

According to the video:
American model of free speech, which largely rejects hate speech laws, is essential because governments and institutions should not have the power to decide which ideas are acceptable. They argue that restricting speech does more than silence offensive opinions, it shapes what people are able to think, discourages open debate, and makes society less resilient by suppressing controversial or unpopular viewpoints. While acknowledging that hate speech laws are intended to protect vulnerable groups, the speaker contends that in practice such laws mainly protect the authority and narratives of those in power. They conclude that true intellectual freedom requires allowing even offensive or unpopular ideas to be expressed so they can be challenged rather than censored.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] sbeak@sopuli.xyz 5 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (2 children)

Free speech is the idea that anyone can voice their own opinions, yes. However, if these opinions hurts others or restrict their free speech in some way, I feel like that shouldn't be allowed. I think most people would probably agree with this.

"Hate speech" is a very broad term that describes all sorts of nasty ideas, but let's give an example of a bigot who wants to relinquish women's suffrage (right to vote) and is advocating for this idea in a public area. This would be an attempt to block the free speech of women, and should not be allowed! You could insert other discriminated communities into this analogy, bigots hate anything that's even a little bit different from themselves.

Hate speech, in a nutshell, is advocating for the removal of rights and/or violence against certain groups of people. In either case, it restricts the freedom of speech of these communities. In many countries where free speech is not as strong, the removal of rights and state violence havd both been used to silence opposition.

[–] sbeak@sopuli.xyz 5 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

Of note, looking at their post history, the original poster seems to have unfavourable views on transgender folks. Yikes!

Their oldest post shows they seem slightly Islamophobic too, at least towards certain sects of Islam. It is titled "how the Sunnis are hiding their atrocities" with no additional context. I'm not religious, but I feel like that isn't very cool of you. In another post, they refer to people who are against Iran's current regime as "exmuslims", implying that OP believes that Muslim = pro-Iran. I also think naming yourself after deities is generally considered disrespectful to most religions, though that differs depending on where you live (e.g. in Latin America, "Jesus" is a common given name), maybe it was okay for OP?

Another thing, they recently posted a few pro-Zionist articles in the news communities, one that claimed the bombed school was actually caused by the Iranians, and another that was about Hamas by the pro-Israeli "YNet" newspaper. They have also been posting off-topic content in these news communities, like for some reason they posted an article about how LLMs would support Palestine over Israel (how is that relevant??)

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 4 points 5 hours ago

In a larger scale of rights overall, your rights to do something should end when it restricts other people's rights. No one person should be above another. Not really how the world works, but it's the idealistic goal.