Rhaedas

joined 2 years ago
[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 3 points 12 hours ago

The blue collar worker should try this approach. Oh, right. We wouldn't have a job in a few days.

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 2 points 15 hours ago

You could make the same case for a browser, an email client, a graphics or video editor, etc. The UI is an interface to basic core processes that are usually the same that all have, with some extras on the top for uniqueness and features that might be more appealing than other UIs.

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 12 points 16 hours ago

Never thought about it, but don't most of their movies have 4th wall breaks anyway?

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

No different in action that all the major companies and governments putting in backdoor stuff for various purposes. The only saving grace is that it is readable code here, but is the fact it wasn't found early on the fault the person who wrote it, or the community that didn't see it?

Would people have used it if it was commented and documented on its purpose? That should tell you something. And if you say yes, that should tell you something as well on how much you want to defend this.

All the drama and stuff beyond this was wrong. But this is core of open source, to make sure code is valid and honest and to call out bugs and maliciousness. Are the people who found and reported it responsible for others' actions after they were pissed about it? Of course not. Doesn't make things beyond dropping the use of it okay, but hey, consequences. Maybe don't do things behind people's back.

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 8 points 1 day ago

It's all Republicans, and some Democrats. Oh, and some Republicans that label themselves as Democrats, even running as one. Which should be illegal and prosecutable as election fraud.

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 29 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Pigeon on a chess board. With an audience clapping and saying they've never seen anyone play the game quite that way. Genius.

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yes and no. He gave the orders. He didn't actually do the actions to make them happen. "I was just following orders" still doesn't work.

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 10 points 1 day ago

if anything else happens that is ACTUALLY important

Then his leadership and tactical brilliance will...

Oh, we're fucked, right?

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 6 points 2 days ago

Companies aren't going to do the best thing for the long term, they're sole purpose is to maximize what's best for the company. It's the role of society in the form of the government to constrict what they can do for the betterment of everyone. So anyone who complains about regulations are probably the same ones who complain about taxes. They don't understand their roles and complexities and just use the sound bites they've heard.

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 2 points 2 days ago

This is true of a lot of modern materials. Plastics, alloys, and microelectronics. The advancements make them better than anything which would be easily reusable or recoverable, or repairable. But we pay the cost, both in them being disposable instead, and in the forced design of being throwaway and not lasting, so profitable to make this was for the companies.

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 5 points 3 days ago

I'd be good with that. Makes sense, the self image imposed on the characters. Nice challenge for the actors too.

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 25 points 3 days ago (3 children)

They'll certainly go with a new adventure using the previous characters, but I'd honestly love it if their roles were cameos or background to some new people in different roles and new issues to overcome, in a new setting. The general vehicle of seeing an actual game from within the world worked well, and plenty to use, but I feel we've seen these characters' arcs and it will feel heavy handed to invent more problems to overcome. And I get it, that's exactly what players will do with their established party, but a lot of the deeper arcs wold be over many adventures and playing sessions, not as a one shot.

But I hope they turn out something decent. I'm all for a lower budget, more character interaction and back and forth.

 

Made something a few months ago and put it on Amazon. Have different variations of covers and two sizes (50 and 100 pages, for 25 and 50 observation nights). Looking for options on the concept, contents (you can view the interior pages for their layout on the Amazon page).

Wondering if it's too flashy and a simple cover might work better, or if it's just because it's Amazon and there's too much competition. Or of course if it's just not what's being looked for.

 

Running Ubuntu 22.04:

I've tried searching for a solution to this, but there's way too many false positives. I know you can enable/disable using a single instance in two places, but that's not my issue. If I open a video the first time, VLC works fine. If I have both the "only use one instance" off, I can click on other videos and they run too. But if I have any combination of those boxes checked I can only play the first video, and to play a new video I have to manually close the VLC player.

What I want to happen is to have one player spawn, but any new video will run in that player, overriding the existing video. Is that just not possible? I don't want to have to close the window every time I run something new, and I don't want to have to go back and lose a whole bunch of separate VLC instances when I'm done.

Update: I found the solution, and I should have tried it first before posting. Oh well, at least I didn't leave anyone who might find this hanging like a DenverCoder9.

Being Ubuntu, VLC was installed via Snap (I can't recall if I did it or it's default). I suppose I should look into the de-Snap process I've seen mentioned before, as I've also had a few non-crash errors since running Ubuntu where snap was the source.

So the solution was to install the Debian version in terminal, not Snap. It works like I expect and wanted, and I can run video after video and it uses the same window.

 

I have an older robot vacuum that has finally shown some age in its battery. The charger will charge for about 15 mins and then gets an error, but it's enough to do a decent vacuuming of the room if I charge then vacuum, then repeat once more. I can't leave it on the charger now due to the error repeating, so basically I run it dead until the next time.

So my question is, can I continue doing this since it works well enough, or is there potential problems/danger with the battery being at less capacity? I could buy a new battery, they aren't terrible in price, but if it works and is safe, why not continue what I'm doing until it completely gives out?

view more: next ›