Rhaedas

There are different levels of AI books, and websites like BN and Amazon ask on their submission what specifically was done by or assisted by AI to get a read on what authors are doing. Full AI written based on a bunch of prompts gets garbage, I agree there, and it's also the easy route so the market is being flooded, especially the low effort ones, since that's far easier to do than actual prose from AI. But AI can also have a subtle aid to an actual writer. I realize some people are dead set on zero AI, period, and I understand the reasons. It sucks we've gotten to this point where some incredible things can be done, and yet so much as been ruined by that progress too, when it could have been done better and more honestly.

As someone who has a few books on Amazon and BN, I've used AI for a bit of behind the scenes for artwork, then taking that in Gimp for the final product. The books were done mainly to see if I could put them together and was fun to do. The hard part is actually selling any, it's a nightmare for the same reason, oversaturation.

I will say that BN's website sucks big time. I thought Amazon's was flaky but figured it out, but I'm surprised I ever got books onto BN as much as it hangs, and I haven't been able to get onto my account in a while to even see how the books are doing there, but I doubt I've sold any because I haven't seen evidence, and I question who goes there now to buy a book.

Fix your website!

Oh, and they also just raised the minimum print price to like $14.99, so no cheap books, and if you have a low cost book there, no one is going to buy it now for those prices. Brilliant.

Clicking on newer revision lets you walk through time.

It's not about finding habitat, but a large scale version of kill or be killed, or stay quiet and hope they don't see you.

Definitely not to enslave. The path that the 3 Body Problem goes down is a science-based eldritch horror.

Yes, the problem was solved.

listens to the last scene

Oh no.

I knew I remembered that name. Great book and reference.

I was with Pizza Hut when we got that directive of empowerment to do what was best to retain the customer. No manager needed for most things, just treat them well. We had a lot of regular customers, I wonder why. That was a long time ago.

Escaping from one gravity well to go to another gravity well that is far more deadly is foolish. Both Mars and the Moon, as well as probably any body that doesn't have some sort of erosion mechanic, has fine, sharp dust which is terrible on both equipment and biology.

I still am a believer just as I was a 70s kid that O'Neill was on the right track, and space is the next logical place for humanity. What has changed over the decades is my belief that we can get there. Not because of the science or the technology, but because of our tendency to focus resources on other things that don't help anyone. The window is all but shut on space now. And any billionaires that send people to Mars in some grand colonization scheme are just dooming them and wasting more on their own ego.

So whatever happens now, humanity will have its eggs in one basket, and that basket does have an expiration date.

I'd say answer just to see if the Dark Forest is valid. If it is, honestly they're going to find us eventually anyway.

So, Ender's Game

Large NEOs are very unlikely at this point for the reasons you've given. It's advanced warning on anything else that's needed. Redirection is another topic, but we have no experience and only theory on the best ways to do it, and wouldn't know which technique to try before a close examination (which means time to find it and get to it just to figure that out). As for advanced warning for evacuation, that's probably the most likely scenario, but it's also morbidly funny to mention in a thread discussing near misses found days before its passing, and often we see articles about the rock after the fact. (Although maybe it was known about before by experts, just didn't hit the press in time)

*Another

What's needed is a 24/7 space-based observation system, not rely on leftover observation time on telescopes and amateur aid. The near misses are rarely even close, and the sizes are small enough to at most endanger a small area, but it's a lesson that if there ever was a big one, we wouldn't even know or be able to do anything. Find the big ones very early, we might be able to change the future, but we won't find them with how we look now.