Rhaedas

joined 2 years ago
[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 12 points 23 hours ago

Be interested, just a little bit, in what they're interested in. Like, you don't have to enjoy it, but show interest and they'll respond a lot more than if you make that a problem they have to choose over.

I mean I might put down the doc simply because I can come back to it anytime, while the moment won't. But what would spark things more is if she asks me something simple about what had my focus.

And this goes both ways. Paying attention to what your SO likes in any amount works so much better than making it something bad.

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I concur, it was faster than a 777. Everything is made with characteristics that fit its purpose.

Looking back at the problem, you say just build more. A 777 carries about 100 tons. The total for shipping crude oil averages around 2.5 billion tons. The world's existing capacity for shipping oil is around 670 million, a rough number since there are various sizes of tankers. The 2000 777s (if that would even work) would replace one ship, not all those ships (thousands of them). You just don't understand the scale.

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 4 points 2 days ago

A lot changed over those decades, so grouping it all together seems a bit too broad.

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 1 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Go ahead and email them, let them know they need to make the planes faster. I'm sure they'll appreciate your consulting advice. Contact Airbus too, they have the same issue.

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 1 points 2 days ago (5 children)

Yeah, they're 2500 orders behind.

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 1 points 2 days ago (7 children)

Boeing hasn't built that many yet since it first became available.

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 2 points 2 days ago (9 children)

Liquid is heavy. Just comparing freight weight capacity, a 777 can carry around 100 tons, while a large freight ship carries 200,000 tons. That's a container ship, not an oil freighter, but you see the difference. We move things that can't take weeks to ship on a plane and pay more for it, while boat shipping is cheap if you can wait for it. And for oil there (usually) is a long queue of ships coming and going, so it doesn't matter about the time.

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 17 points 3 days ago (14 children)

Imagine UBI and allowing robots and AI for the mundane tasks that are dangerous or boring. The jobs no one wants to work.

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 3 points 3 days ago

"Don't make me angry. You don't want to see me when I'm angry." - Fred Rogers

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 6 points 3 days ago

Dysfunctional society governed by foolishness rather than wisdom.

A number of great songs with the title too, with similar messages. Robert Plant, Grateful Dead, Bob Seger, World Party, The Doors.

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 1 points 3 days ago

Young adult in the 80-90s was peak. I think things would be different if we could take a glimpse into the future and realize how good we had it. There were problems, but most weren't predicaments yet. And it's definitely the era that we point back to and say "we didn't listen".

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 28 points 3 days ago

The download is the title and what everyone is latching onto, but few are seeing the other problems, like how it secretly installed that model without user acceptance, how it uses obscurity to hide the model, how it will reinstall if you just delete it (fortunately there's an uninstall process linked in the comments, does that include uninstalling Chrome?). And then how it pretends to be an extra AI thing on the browser but apparently will be used for any searching. Which is more energy use since it isn't local, it's just using the weights in storage.

It's all bad, even if it wasn't AI. It's what malware does.

 

Made something a few months ago and put it on Amazon. Have different variations of covers and two sizes (50 and 100 pages, for 25 and 50 observation nights). Looking for options on the concept, contents (you can view the interior pages for their layout on the Amazon page).

Wondering if it's too flashy and a simple cover might work better, or if it's just because it's Amazon and there's too much competition. Or of course if it's just not what's being looked for.

 

Running Ubuntu 22.04:

I've tried searching for a solution to this, but there's way too many false positives. I know you can enable/disable using a single instance in two places, but that's not my issue. If I open a video the first time, VLC works fine. If I have both the "only use one instance" off, I can click on other videos and they run too. But if I have any combination of those boxes checked I can only play the first video, and to play a new video I have to manually close the VLC player.

What I want to happen is to have one player spawn, but any new video will run in that player, overriding the existing video. Is that just not possible? I don't want to have to close the window every time I run something new, and I don't want to have to go back and lose a whole bunch of separate VLC instances when I'm done.

Update: I found the solution, and I should have tried it first before posting. Oh well, at least I didn't leave anyone who might find this hanging like a DenverCoder9.

Being Ubuntu, VLC was installed via Snap (I can't recall if I did it or it's default). I suppose I should look into the de-Snap process I've seen mentioned before, as I've also had a few non-crash errors since running Ubuntu where snap was the source.

So the solution was to install the Debian version in terminal, not Snap. It works like I expect and wanted, and I can run video after video and it uses the same window.

 

I have an older robot vacuum that has finally shown some age in its battery. The charger will charge for about 15 mins and then gets an error, but it's enough to do a decent vacuuming of the room if I charge then vacuum, then repeat once more. I can't leave it on the charger now due to the error repeating, so basically I run it dead until the next time.

So my question is, can I continue doing this since it works well enough, or is there potential problems/danger with the battery being at less capacity? I could buy a new battery, they aren't terrible in price, but if it works and is safe, why not continue what I'm doing until it completely gives out?

view more: next ›