Rhaedas

joined 2 years ago
[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 4 points 4 hours ago

That's the rub. Local models have some positives, but overall the source for them is a negative. And the worst thing is, we can't fix that now. We can't undo what's been done, we can't start over with new data that is fair, and we can't seem to get AI out of where it's been jammed in.

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 3 points 4 hours ago

Agreed. The short is that AI was done wrong in so many ways, for the wrong reasons, and was the wrong direction for the goal they continue to insist they are trying to reach. The science and technology and what it can do, even the worst of it, is fascinating, but this is not what it should have been. Money corrupted yet another thing.

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 9 points 6 hours ago

Either I have some inside knowledge of that exact thing happening and I know the company (not saying who) or this is probably a common things that happened to a lot of major companies (more likely). To be fair, I do not have privy on how far it went and how much it cost before they realize the problem, and it may not have been this much. Which further suggests it's a thing everywhere.

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 3 points 6 hours ago

I think it's an earlier episode than "Miri", but the one where they get infected and everyone is doing stuff because their barriers are down (drunk), Kirk mentions in his breakdown before Spock kicks sense into him the ensign that he sees every day, but can't do anything. So there was the thoughts deep down, but Kirk has disciple and morality. Even more so in the novel version, Kirk is a prodigy in most canon books and wouldn't do that stuff.

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 2 points 11 hours ago

That has the same energy as James Burke's episode about the single power relay that brought down the East Coast. People aren't aware of how many potential cascade effects we have around us just waiting for the right moment.

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 33 points 2 days ago

I don't think Youtube's history on false positives for things is all that stellar. Maybe if they get AI to help it will... oh, no, it will make it far worse than even Youtube can do alone.

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 3 points 2 days ago

I jumped on the bandwagon when it first came out, found some stuff interesting, but yeah, the ground aspect didn't work for me. Probably didn't help that everyone was doing the same stuff, so there were lines to scan and collect and whatever. Didn't feel like a real away mission. Might be better with age, since much fewer would be in one place.

I think for the ships I was expecting more like Starfleet Command, which was not realistic for an online version.

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 18 points 2 days ago

No, it looks like it's moving.

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 5 points 2 days ago

If you have a few things that work better without or don't need the VPN, like some games, a good VPN will have a tunneling feature to let that one thing through while staying on for everything else.

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 4 points 3 days ago

Reread through Flood by Stephen Baxter. Now a third or so through the sequel Ark. Read them years ago, remembering stuff a bit as I go back through it, but seeing it anew as an starting author, and comparing writing and such with what I have. Did that earlier with Artemis. Made me feel a bit better for my writing, even though I do have a ways to go editing.

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

That was my first Pern book. Loved it. Found Ruth a fascinating outlier especially after reading more books and seeing what a "normal" dragon is like. It's possible a reread would be less because of your point, it's a teen perspective, and I was a teen.

Favorite Pern might be Dragonsdawn, simply because it's harder scifi to explain why it's all there.

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 2 points 3 days ago

It can mean that If it's used singularly.

 

Made something a few months ago and put it on Amazon. Have different variations of covers and two sizes (50 and 100 pages, for 25 and 50 observation nights). Looking for options on the concept, contents (you can view the interior pages for their layout on the Amazon page).

Wondering if it's too flashy and a simple cover might work better, or if it's just because it's Amazon and there's too much competition. Or of course if it's just not what's being looked for.

 

Running Ubuntu 22.04:

I've tried searching for a solution to this, but there's way too many false positives. I know you can enable/disable using a single instance in two places, but that's not my issue. If I open a video the first time, VLC works fine. If I have both the "only use one instance" off, I can click on other videos and they run too. But if I have any combination of those boxes checked I can only play the first video, and to play a new video I have to manually close the VLC player.

What I want to happen is to have one player spawn, but any new video will run in that player, overriding the existing video. Is that just not possible? I don't want to have to close the window every time I run something new, and I don't want to have to go back and lose a whole bunch of separate VLC instances when I'm done.

Update: I found the solution, and I should have tried it first before posting. Oh well, at least I didn't leave anyone who might find this hanging like a DenverCoder9.

Being Ubuntu, VLC was installed via Snap (I can't recall if I did it or it's default). I suppose I should look into the de-Snap process I've seen mentioned before, as I've also had a few non-crash errors since running Ubuntu where snap was the source.

So the solution was to install the Debian version in terminal, not Snap. It works like I expect and wanted, and I can run video after video and it uses the same window.

 

I have an older robot vacuum that has finally shown some age in its battery. The charger will charge for about 15 mins and then gets an error, but it's enough to do a decent vacuuming of the room if I charge then vacuum, then repeat once more. I can't leave it on the charger now due to the error repeating, so basically I run it dead until the next time.

So my question is, can I continue doing this since it works well enough, or is there potential problems/danger with the battery being at less capacity? I could buy a new battery, they aren't terrible in price, but if it works and is safe, why not continue what I'm doing until it completely gives out?

view more: next ›