Rhaedas

joined 2 years ago
[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 35 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Clicking on newer revision lets you walk through time.

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 1 points 16 hours ago

It's not about finding habitat, but a large scale version of kill or be killed, or stay quiet and hope they don't see you.

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 1 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

Definitely not to enslave. The path that the 3 Body Problem goes down is a science-based eldritch horror.

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 21 points 1 day ago (8 children)

Yes, the problem was solved.

listens to the last scene

Oh no.

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 6 points 1 day ago

I knew I remembered that name. Great book and reference.

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 17 points 1 day ago

I was with Pizza Hut when we got that directive of empowerment to do what was best to retain the customer. No manager needed for most things, just treat them well. We had a lot of regular customers, I wonder why. That was a long time ago.

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Escaping from one gravity well to go to another gravity well that is far more deadly is foolish. Both Mars and the Moon, as well as probably any body that doesn't have some sort of erosion mechanic, has fine, sharp dust which is terrible on both equipment and biology.

I still am a believer just as I was a 70s kid that O'Neill was on the right track, and space is the next logical place for humanity. What has changed over the decades is my belief that we can get there. Not because of the science or the technology, but because of our tendency to focus resources on other things that don't help anyone. The window is all but shut on space now. And any billionaires that send people to Mars in some grand colonization scheme are just dooming them and wasting more on their own ego.

So whatever happens now, humanity will have its eggs in one basket, and that basket does have an expiration date.

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 3 points 1 day ago (4 children)

I'd say answer just to see if the Dark Forest is valid. If it is, honestly they're going to find us eventually anyway.

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 3 points 1 day ago

So, Ender's Game

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 4 points 1 day ago

Large NEOs are very unlikely at this point for the reasons you've given. It's advanced warning on anything else that's needed. Redirection is another topic, but we have no experience and only theory on the best ways to do it, and wouldn't know which technique to try before a close examination (which means time to find it and get to it just to figure that out). As for advanced warning for evacuation, that's probably the most likely scenario, but it's also morbidly funny to mention in a thread discussing near misses found days before its passing, and often we see articles about the rock after the fact. (Although maybe it was known about before by experts, just didn't hit the press in time)

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 21 points 1 day ago (5 children)

*Another

What's needed is a 24/7 space-based observation system, not rely on leftover observation time on telescopes and amateur aid. The near misses are rarely even close, and the sizes are small enough to at most endanger a small area, but it's a lesson that if there ever was a big one, we wouldn't even know or be able to do anything. Find the big ones very early, we might be able to change the future, but we won't find them with how we look now.

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 10 points 1 day ago

Not all parts of the brain deteriorate at the same rate.

 

Made something a few months ago and put it on Amazon. Have different variations of covers and two sizes (50 and 100 pages, for 25 and 50 observation nights). Looking for options on the concept, contents (you can view the interior pages for their layout on the Amazon page).

Wondering if it's too flashy and a simple cover might work better, or if it's just because it's Amazon and there's too much competition. Or of course if it's just not what's being looked for.

 

Running Ubuntu 22.04:

I've tried searching for a solution to this, but there's way too many false positives. I know you can enable/disable using a single instance in two places, but that's not my issue. If I open a video the first time, VLC works fine. If I have both the "only use one instance" off, I can click on other videos and they run too. But if I have any combination of those boxes checked I can only play the first video, and to play a new video I have to manually close the VLC player.

What I want to happen is to have one player spawn, but any new video will run in that player, overriding the existing video. Is that just not possible? I don't want to have to close the window every time I run something new, and I don't want to have to go back and lose a whole bunch of separate VLC instances when I'm done.

Update: I found the solution, and I should have tried it first before posting. Oh well, at least I didn't leave anyone who might find this hanging like a DenverCoder9.

Being Ubuntu, VLC was installed via Snap (I can't recall if I did it or it's default). I suppose I should look into the de-Snap process I've seen mentioned before, as I've also had a few non-crash errors since running Ubuntu where snap was the source.

So the solution was to install the Debian version in terminal, not Snap. It works like I expect and wanted, and I can run video after video and it uses the same window.

 

I have an older robot vacuum that has finally shown some age in its battery. The charger will charge for about 15 mins and then gets an error, but it's enough to do a decent vacuuming of the room if I charge then vacuum, then repeat once more. I can't leave it on the charger now due to the error repeating, so basically I run it dead until the next time.

So my question is, can I continue doing this since it works well enough, or is there potential problems/danger with the battery being at less capacity? I could buy a new battery, they aren't terrible in price, but if it works and is safe, why not continue what I'm doing until it completely gives out?

view more: next ›