this post was submitted on 06 Jul 2026
347 points (99.2% liked)

Technology

86122 readers
4387 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works 20 points 21 hours ago (3 children)

They’re worried the sound drove down the price of their home, but they didn’t join the lawsuit… I’m officially confused.

Doing something that lowers the value of somebody’s house is usually a pretty slam dunk way for that person to be able to sue you. The article doesn’t mention if they have some sort of weird attachment to the house, but otherwise why wouldn’t you just wanna take the money and move somewhere else in the same town or otherwise? Especially if it’s already been four fucking years.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 2 points 7 hours ago

that is why nimbyism exists. these Ai datacenters are built in places where the locals arnt rich enough to block the construction.

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 3 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

They probably have a stronger claim and higher-ceiling on their portion of any judgment suing individually.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 14 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

They probably have more to gain in individual action than class action

[–] atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works -1 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Joining a lawsuit like that wouldn’t automatically make it class action.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 2 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

I'm not a class action law person, but I would think having that large a group of people harmed could qualify for lawsuit consolidation under a class action, assuming they could appropriately define the class.

[–] atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works 3 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

I am also not an expert in this area, however AFAIK being capable of being class action doesn’t make it class action. The Sandy Hook families sued Alex Jones and the number of plaintiffs didn’t make that class action either. As well, in Oklahoma right now there are 100s of similar cases against State Farm regarding hail damage payouts and despite intervention from the state AG these have not become a class action. From the information we do have at least one household invited at least one other household to join a lawsuit and they declined, beyond that we don’t know that there are even other plaintiffs to begin with.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 3 points 19 hours ago

yeah, the scenario i'm thinking of is that they have a few ten thousands lawsuits in that area alone and the respondent (whoever owns the datacenter) registers to have all those lawsuits consolidated. i could swear i've heard of it happening but again, not an area of law i've so much as been adjacent to.