this post was submitted on 06 Jul 2026
489 points (99.6% liked)

Games

25414 readers
1182 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Just in time for them to take physical discs away!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] otp@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

I'm not here to defend the corporations.

Email addresses are PII under GDPR, aren't they? So linking email addresses to purchase history is explicitly retaining PII and data about someone they can identify.

[–] TroublesomeTalker@feddit.uk 3 points 45 minutes ago (1 children)

You are explicitly allowed to retain PII for critical business purposes. So in this case as a key component that the software licence is attached to they can retain it forever anyway.

[–] GMac@feddit.org 2 points 28 minutes ago

Pretty sure that the gdpr specifically precludes forever retention. Data should be retained as long as is necessary and whether 1, 3, 5, 10 or however many years, sooner or later deletion is appropriate, and the timeline depends on what is reasonable.

3 years is a long time to not log in and if a court decided that it exceeded a 'reasonable' period for legitimate interest the fines can go to 10% of global revenue. The law encourages risk averse behaviour.

They could make a better system where the user sets the timeline but it would be impossible to predict the return.

On this one i think its probably driven by risk management not nefarious intent.