this post was submitted on 06 Jul 2026
846 points (99.0% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

40693 readers
4251 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://hexbear.net/post/8955441

He was a coomer, Ben Franklin?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] papalonian@lemmy.world 2 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Cawthorn

Crawford

My point is that your original comment was not to Cawthorn. It was to someone completely different. Cawthorn could have a swastika in his profile picture and call for the extinction of all trans people and it wouldn't justify your being rude to some random guy online who said, "yeah the founding fathers would be horrified".

You're acting like you're talking directly to the OP and responding directly to Cawthorn's tweet, when you're not.

Finally, I didn't 'assume' anything. I've run across Ms. Crawford's comments in the past, and happened to remember the name.

I'm not saying you're assuming Cawthorn's position. I'm saying you're assuming Dookieman12's position. What do Cawthorn's past comments have to do with the person you're actually responding to?

[–] DagwoodIII@piefed.social -1 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

You're adorable.

Don't ever change.

[–] FreeAZ@sopuli.xyz 1 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

You're an idiot.

Please change.

[–] DagwoodIII@piefed.social 1 points 8 hours ago

Unlike you, I don't get upset by people trying to have fun.

But if it makes you feel like your accomplishing something, feel free to go ahead and berate me.

[–] papalonian@lemmy.world 1 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

So are ad hominem attacks when someone can no longer defend their position, or even acknowledge the obvious mistake they sarcastically defended.

I don't see why I would, based on this interaction.

[–] DagwoodIII@piefed.social 0 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

even acknowledge the obvious mistake they sarcastically defended.

I've been replying to all your screeds.

Isn't that acknowledgement enough for you, you greedy little minx?

[–] papalonian@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

No, I want you to concede at the very least that you acted like I was incapable of understanding your ClEveR comment when it was in fact you that made a mistake, and it'd be even better if you admitted that your random "well there were trans people in the 1700s dumby!" quip a. had absolutely nothing to do with what anyone was talking about, b. was unnecessarily rude to someone who only disagreed with you in your own mind, and c. failed to disprove the thing you decided to argue against. But I don't think you're gonna do any of that so I think we're done.