this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2026
51 points (81.5% liked)

Unpopular Opinion

9211 readers
854 users here now

Welcome to the Unpopular Opinion community!


How voting works:

Vote the opposite of the norm.


If you agree that the opinion is unpopular give it an arrow up. If it's something that's widely accepted, give it an arrow down.



Guidelines:

Tag your post, if possible (not required)


  • If your post is a "General" unpopular opinion, start the subject with [GENERAL].
  • If it is a Lemmy-specific unpopular opinion, start it with [LEMMY].


Rules:

1. NO POLITICS


Politics is everywhere. Let's make this about [general] and [lemmy] - specific topics, and keep politics out of it.


2. Be civil.


Disagreements happen, but that doesn’t provide the right to personally attack others. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Please also refrain from gatekeeping others' opinions.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Shitposts and memes are allowed but...


Only until they prove to be a problem. They can and will be removed at moderator discretion.


5. No trolling.


This shouldn't need an explanation. If your post or comment is made just to get a rise with no real value, it will be removed. You do this too often, you will get a vacation to touch grass, away from this community for 1 or more days. Repeat offenses will result in a perma-ban.


6. Defend your opinion


This is a bit of a mix of rules 4 and 5 to help foster higher quality posts. You are expected to defend your unpopular opinion in the post body. We don't expect a whole manifesto (please, no manifestos), but you should at least provide some details as to why you hold the position you do.



Instance-wide rules always apply. https://legal.lemmy.world/tos/

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I can't stand this bloody series. 'It's art for the sake of art'. 'This is really Lynch's gift to all subsequent media'. 'There is so much we owe to this series.'

What the hell. It's just random pieces of script written by monkeys on a typewriter, slapped together. No part of the story is ever finished. 'Ah but that's where the depth resides!'. Rubbish. Anybody can write a story that doesn't properly finish.

Oh I know I will introduce 20 new characters, this will add so much depth. Yeah, they have no motives, no character development BUT I will add this random surreal thing that happens to them, for additional depth. But what happens to X? Who knows! And to Y? You have to guess! And to Z? No one can tell!

Maybe using steel-faced actors will improve the plot? I know I will cast myself in one role with quirky details because it's so fun. Yeah I don't know how to act, why? Is it necessary?

And the goddamn music is unsufferable. 'You can't separate Lynch's work from Badalamenti's music'. Yeah I know they're both shit. Oh and the effing gigs in the sequel of the series. Aaaaaah!

But at least there is some symbolism! Yes, what is it? Who fucking knows!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] DrBob@lemmy.ca 9 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (2 children)

May I ask how old you are? I'm not prying, but I'm curious if you watched it when it was new or if you are younger and only know it from DVD/streaming.

I am old enough that I watched it as it was broadcast, and it was unlike anything that had been done on TV before. I don't even know how Lynch got it made. It landed like a bombshell in the midst of sanitized pap. It was gritty and played with sex, drugs, and evil in a way that made shows like Miami Vice look vapid. It may seem like half finished, trope laden junk now, but it cut the path that every edgy show since had followed. Issues like the duality of people - the homogenized surface facade of presenting how we want to be vs the inner desire and how we are just hadn't been addressed in that way before.

There is some deliberate hokiness to it. The parallel of the soap opera to the town is deliberate and a wink to the fact that every story is largely the same but dressed up in a new way. Think of "a stranger comes to town, or someone goes on a journey" level analysis. The humor is pure Lynch.

It may seem different in retrospect because it's done better now. Audiences are comfortable with this kind of thing. It was brand new then, and somehow approved by the same network that approved Thirtysomething and cut 40 minutes of sex and drugs from Scarface.

[–] commonmarmoset@reddthat.com 2 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

This is some interesting context, which I was aware of but never properly considered. I think this has given me a better appreciation of Lynch. I saw Twin Peaks well after it was made. I also saw it after having been exposed to a lot of alternative cinema. I think I missed the chance to love it, both from a era of film perspective and from a gateway into more weird stuff perspective.

[–] Mr_Wobble@thelemmy.club 1 points 6 minutes ago

I think Twin Peaks suffers from the Seinfeld problem. It was SO influential there are now pieces of it in almost everything that even remotely shares a genre with it. And if you grew up watching all the stuff it influenced, going back to watch the origin, that sparked the imaginations of all those creators, can seem kinda hokey, trite, and underwhelming.

[–] drolex@sopuli.xyz 3 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Without giving too many details: I'm old enough to have watched it on TV years ago and I had to go through it again with my wife recently.

[–] DrBob@lemmy.ca 2 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

I was in university and I remember being in Montreal in a bar when an episode was about to air. I went to a stranger's home to watch TV with them and their friends because none of us wanted to miss an episode.