this post was submitted on 11 Jul 2026
873 points (98.6% liked)

Technology

86264 readers
5053 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] roofuskit@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Expect this to be priced like a laser printer. Most inkjet printers are subsidized by cartridge lock in and ink priced higher than platinum by ounce.

[–] errer@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Honestly, I don’t mind inkjet as a technology, the quality is plenty good and I don’t give a crap about speed. And as you can see from this design they’re a whole lot more compact. The whole reason I don’t use them is the predatory ink pricing, which this product in theory solves!

[–] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

For now, you can get inkjet printers that use liquid ink. Ostensibly Canon wants me to use Canon brand ink for my printer, but there's nothing stopping me from buying some off brand and dumping it in the tanks

[–] roofuskit@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Tank inkjets tend not to be subsidized because of the lack of lock in. They're considerably more expensive than those that use cartridges. So you are paying for the ability to put in whatever you want.

[–] slampisko@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Which to me is a no-brainer. (I do have a laser printer though)

[–] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeah, mine did cost like $160, but it is nice to know that canon can't decide to end support and brick it in 10 years

[–] roofuskit@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

That's actually a good deal for a tank inkjet last I saw.