this post was submitted on 21 Nov 2023
211 points (98.6% liked)

News

38239 readers
2192 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 52 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Cops sure do enjoy killing dogs, don't they?

[–] gramathy@lemmy.ml 34 points 2 years ago (1 children)

They’re jealous, dogs actually protect and serve

[–] chatokun@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 years ago

Nah, if jealous they'd try it themselves. Nah, this is the guy who does a mediocre job, then thinks the people who actually do it well are just doing it to make him look bad.

[–] be_excellent_to_each_other@kbin.social 15 points 2 years ago (2 children)

https://www.criminallegalnews.org/news/2018/jun/16/doj-police-shooting-family-dogs-has-become-epidemic/

I believe the DOJ report is linked somewhere in that article, if not I'll dig it up if requested.

Cops in this country kill so many dogs each year that a specialist at the Department of Justice’s (“DOJ”) community-oriented program services office says it has become an “epidemic.” The DOJ estimates that around 25 to 30 dogs are killed by cops every day, with some numbers as high as 10,000 per year. The totals could, in fact, be higher, since most police agencies do not formally track officer-involved shootings involving animals.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 14 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Holy fuck! I knew it was bad but 10,000 a year?!

[–] be_excellent_to_each_other@kbin.social 16 points 2 years ago (2 children)

My first reaction to that final quoted sentence is "well they are callous with human life, why wouldn't they be with a dog?"

But my second reaction is, "Don't they have to account for every on-duty weapon discharge??" You'd think putting "shot dog" as the reason you fired your weapon would be trackable.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago

It also implies that the same cop has killed a dog more than once. Which would get you fired in pretty much any other situation. But of course, cops are always immune from that sort of thing.

[–] MightEnlightenYou@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

No, they don't have to account for every discharge, in fact no one in the US has any idea how many times police fire their weapons.

[–] bedrooms@kbin.social 7 points 2 years ago

I believe in most countries that number is close to zero. No way majority of the 10,000 dogs are life-threatening, and yet the US police disagree and shoot. Tells so much about US police's justification on shooting at people.

[–] Instigate@aussie.zone 2 points 2 years ago

10,000 dogs per year and yet we still don’t have a real-life John Wick bringing down the Police mafia. Damn.

[–] _haha_oh_wow_@sh.itjust.works 10 points 2 years ago

It seems to be a national past time when it comes to enforcers.