this post was submitted on 13 Jul 2026
320 points (99.1% liked)

movies

3661 readers
1361 users here now

A community about movies and cinema.

Related communities:

Rules

  1. Be civil
  2. No discrimination or prejudice of any kind
  3. Do not spam
  4. Stay on topic
  5. These rules will evolve as this community grows

No posts or comments will be removed without an explanation from mods.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 67 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Apparently it's not as risk-free as they thought.

[–] UnspecificGravity@piefed.social 1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Against the billions they have made churning these out? Yeah, it is.

[–] blartcap_@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

If they were looking at things collectively this way, they wouldn't be making so many remakes and would be making more original movies.

This movie is the result of the risk analysis of each project, not the risk over a time period with multiple projects.

[–] gusgalarnyk@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago

I mean yes on average but potentially no on the trend. The whole point is to de-risk their bullshit, if they view this as a trend instead of an isolated incident other projects might be more likely to get greenlit instead of recycled stories. Pretty much any soulless cash grab bombing incentivizes making actual art.