this post was submitted on 13 Jul 2026
363 points (98.9% liked)

movies

3834 readers
213 users here now

A community about movies and cinema.

Related communities:

Rules

  1. Be civil
  2. No discrimination or prejudice of any kind
  3. Do not spam
  4. Stay on topic
  5. These rules will evolve as this community grows

No posts or comments will be removed without an explanation from mods.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MagicShel@lemmy.zip 206 points 1 month ago (2 children)

There is a beautiful version of Moana already. I can't imagine needing to see this. I don't hate these remakes for existing, but I just don't see the point.

[–] BigShammy80@feddit.org 55 points 1 month ago (1 children)

No one does... any why should they? The classic disney films are great, they don't need remakes...

[–] altphoto@lemmy.today 48 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I wish someone re-mastered the Donald duck and Goofy driving instructional/documentary videos/movies

[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 21 points 1 month ago

Goofy teaching how to play sports was great, too. Basketball game starts, players jump and start slapping one another

[–] mereo@piefed.ca 42 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Studios don't like risks nowadays. So they'd rather remake successful past movies.

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 74 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Apparently it's not as risk-free as they thought.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Tiresia@slrpnk.net 34 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Ah yes, losing $100,000,000 seems very low-risk.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] troed@fedia.io 141 points 1 month ago (3 children)

My daughter loves the Moana movies. I've told her about this one - and the anti-excitement of "the same movie but with actual persons" is quite obvious. I can only conclude that no actual parents were involved in its inception.

[–] Nangijala@feddit.dk 16 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Friend, I am positively obsessed with mermaid movies. I have watched some of the worst movies in existence, just to watch mermaids flop around in water and look pretty. I didn't even bother with the live action remake of the little mermaid. It looked so fucking shit, I couldn't even pretend to care. And I also didn't understand them casting Halle, because she's such a soft an gentle soul and not at all like Ariel. Her sister, Chloe would have been a better Ariel because she has that similar spark of defiance in her that Ariel needs (I used to watch their youtube channel back in the day because I liked their singing). But eh, I guess. I'm just glad that Halle had an overall good experience with the film and that her career appears to be going well.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] carbonari_sandwich@piefed.social 83 points 1 month ago (17 children)

Here's my pitch: Let's animate the live action Disney movies. They have these properties to draw from, and instead of making a live-action remake of them like Freaky Friday or Herbie, or a sequel like Hocus Pocus or Mary Poppins Returns, reinvent it as an animated feature.

  • 20,000 Leagues Under the Sea (1954)
  • The Shaggy Dog (1959)
  • Pollyanna (1960)
  • The Absent-Minded Professor (1961)
  • The Three Lives of Thomasina (1964)
  • Bedknobs and Broomsticks (1971)
  • Escape to Witch Mountain (1975)
  • The Cat from Outer Space (1978)
  • Honey, I Shrunk the Kids (1989)
  • White Fang (1991)
  • The Rocketeer (1991)
  • Newsies (1992)
  • The Mighty Ducks (1992)
  • The Adventures of Huck Finn (1993)
  • Cool Runnings (1993)
  • Blank Check (1994)
  • Heavyweights (1995)
  • A Kid in King Arthur's Court (1995)
  • George of the Jungle (1997)
  • Air Bud (1997)
  • RocketMan (1997)
  • Inspector Gadget (1999)
[–] atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works 38 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Bedknobs and Broomsticks but the animated parts are live action…

Incidentally Bedknobs and Broomsticks is the better Mary Poppins, I know I know it’s an unpopular opinion but I stand by it.

[–] Maestro@fedia.io 17 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I agree! As a kid I was obsessed by the final battle between the Nazis and the animated armors!

[–] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago

ah, but would Di$ney risk possibly alienating a few movie goers by depicting Nazis as bad and incompetent today?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Nangijala@feddit.dk 10 points 1 month ago

I'm here to join the Bedknobs is better than Poppins-club. Not that I hate Mary Poppins. I just think Bedknobs is way more fun.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Zoomboingding@lemmy.world 25 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Honey I Shrunk the Kids would make a great animated movie, and Rick Morranis could reprise his role!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] kata1yst@sh.itjust.works 16 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works 18 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That’s remake of The Absent-Minded Professor which is on the list.

[–] kata1yst@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Oh I didn't realize they were one and the same!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] kn0wmad1c@programming.dev 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Blank Check

Disney really wants everyone to forget this movie, wherein a thirty-something adult falls in love and makes out with a child, exists.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)
[–] hal_5700X@sh.itjust.works 68 points 1 month ago (1 children)
  • Makes an live-action version
  • It's 90-95% CGI

What's the point?

[–] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 33 points 1 month ago

From that studio that gave you "Live Action" Lion King.

[–] DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com 57 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Good

Pray this is the end of this live action shit

[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 16 points 1 month ago (2 children)

They probably needed a tax writeoff or whatever, so don't keep your hopes up

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 12 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Yes. They will definitely get the message, this time.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] FiniteBanjo@feddit.online 53 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Really proves how simple-minded these people were. They were creating cashgrab nostalgia remakes in a manner that snubs royalties to original crews who worked on the original films, but they couldn't even tell remaking a modern film with no nostalgia value was a bad idea.

[–] RamenJunkie@midwest.social 22 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Is Moana even old enough to HAVE Nostalgia? Isn't Moana like, 5 years old or something?

[–] mercano@lemmy.world 32 points 1 month ago (4 children)

It’s not quite 10 years old. The animated version (and I hate I now need to qualify that) came out November 23, 2016. Still way too soon for a remake, especially when you don’t even recast the second name on the call sheet.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] dfyx@lemmy.helios42.de 14 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Ten years. Still not old enough. To maximize nostalgia, they would have to wait until those who enjoyed the original movie have their own children of the right age, so at least 20-25 years. Which, to nobody's surprise, neatly matches the time span between original and remake for The Lion King (25 years) and The Beauty and the Beast (26 years). For The Little Mermaid, they waited even longer (34 years).

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] TomMasz@lemmy.world 45 points 1 month ago

Disney: Every one of our animated films requires a half-hearted live-action remake.

Everyone else: No.

[–] DJKJuicy@sh.itjust.works 44 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (5 children)

I mean...I already watched this movie like 10 years ago. I know what happens already.

OK, Maui is now The Rock in a muscle suit and a wig. But most of the new movie is CGI. The original movie was also animated. Why do I need to watch the new one?

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] mintiefresh@piefed.ca 30 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Nobody asked for this movie.

[–] Trex202@lemmy.world 27 points 1 month ago (4 children)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] accideath@feddit.org 29 points 1 month ago

Moana is probably my favourite animated movie. I see absolute zero reason to watch the remake.

[–] SethTaylor@lemmy.world 28 points 1 month ago

I didn't even know it was coming out and even after seeing this post I still don't care enough to click the article

Feels fucking good leaving this nasty-ass comment though haha

[–] Zachariah@lemmy.world 24 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Yes, but at least the intellectual property claim lasts ten years longer.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.cafe 21 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Let’s dump all the charm and character of the famously last major hand-drawn animation and cover it in slop.

Wait, why aren’t people fighting to give us their money?!?!

[–] davetortoise@reddthat.com 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.cafe 17 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I’m an idiot. And/or didn’t have my coffee yet.

I was thinking of Lilo And Stitch.

[–] davetortoise@reddthat.com 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Hand-drawn moana is an excellent idea actually

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] TheVoiceOfRaison@thelemmy.club 15 points 1 month ago

Good, hopefully this will serve as a message to stop making pointless live action remakes. The fact they didnt cast the original voice actress for the lead role is bewildering, but maybe she read between the lines and didn't want it.

[–] CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de 15 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It’s pretty obvious:

  • too soon for nostalgia
  • half the movie and characters is animated anyways
[–] DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 1 month ago

Plus Moana was all about the vibrant colors and visuals.

How the live action looks so lifeless and this was considered acceptable baffles me. Even when the teaser was first shown many had complaints that it looked nothing like the source material in terms of vibrancy and color choices.

[–] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 12 points 1 month ago

Feels pretty disrespectful to the audience of the original, like “you watched an animation but it’s a real movie now!”, except the real movie is just as much an animation.

[–] skeezix@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago
[–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 month ago

We. Don’t. Need. To. Live. Action. Every. FUCKING. Thing.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

So far all their live remakes have flopped, why do they continue this shit

[–] TheImpressiveX@piefed.social 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

So far all their live remakes have flopped

Aladdin, Lion King, and Lilo & Stitch have all been financial successes.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

The hierarchy of power in the live-action remake universe is about to change.

load more comments
view more: next ›