this post was submitted on 17 Jul 2026
149 points (96.3% liked)

politics

30470 readers
2506 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 11 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

Trump has no idea what he's talking about, but it is a serious issue if these voting machines are still in-use.

A voting machine should be a dumb embedded system. If it can run doom, they did something very, very wrong.

[–] Floon@lemmy.ml 8 points 2 days ago (3 children)

You can run Doom on some DSLRs. These days, it can be hard to find bottom-end hardware that can't be made to run Doom.

[–] ryannathans@aussie.zone 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

The point is you shouldn't be able to tamper with it to replace the software on it

Not Doom itself..

[–] Floon@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It sounds like you don’t know how tech works.

That the hardware can run some software is not an indication that it is flawed or vulnerable in any way.

[–] ryannathans@aussie.zone 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I was an embedded systems lead professionally lmao

Microcontrollers can be locked down and have fuses burnt so you cannot reprogram them

[–] Floon@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

So you don't ever get to update them or fix bugs without entirely new hardware... yeah, all the counties around the country can afford that.

[–] ryannathans@aussie.zone 0 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

This is a voting system, not a sign at the bus stop

Security is paramount

It shouldn't even be electronic in the first place

[–] Floon@lemmy.ml 0 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (1 children)

You say that as if you know the setup of how computers are used in elections. You should check your county, to see if you can get certified as an election observer. It's very educational.

The computers used in elections have highly controlled inputs: no network cards, disabled USB ports, very restricted access by limited, accountable people. They are constantly tested for accuracy, with everything logged and inspected. Security is the most paramount thing, and you're talking like only you care about it.

Human counting is far less accurate, so the "no computer" notion is just stupid.

[–] ryannathans@aussie.zone 0 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

I live in Australia where computers are not used to place votes, where there need to be no special trusted accountable computer people

https://youtu.be/w3_0x6oaDmI

https://youtu.be/LkH2r-sNjQs

Here's Tom Scott explaining why electronic voting is a bad idea

[–] Floon@lemmy.ml 0 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (1 children)

Good for you. Enjoy your elections with 1/12th of the population of the US.

[–] ryannathans@aussie.zone 1 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (1 children)

What does population have to do with it?

United Condom with 70 million people also use paper voting

[–] Floon@lemmy.ml 0 points 14 hours ago

We all use paper ballots, too. We use computers to count them.

Do you not know this, about the system you're judging?

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

yeah, I looked it up-- you need 4 MB of ram and a 80386 processor to run doom, which was released in 1993. A crummy pixel phone processor is about 3500 times faster than a 80386. And a low end computer today has at least 8 gb of memory, which is 2000 times 4 mb.

This cheapo TI-30XA calculator for $9.99 on amazon has roughly the same MIPS rating (million of instructions per second) as a 80386 processor from that era.
https://www.amazon.com/Texas-Instruments-TI-30Xa-Scientific-Calculator/dp/B00000JBNS/138-5956401-1751427?psc=1

I'm not shocked that a voting machine has the same capability as a $9.99 calculator. Its probably the cheapest processor they can find.

[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl -1 points 2 days ago

Sure, and DSLRs aren't voting machines.

[–] FalschgeldFurkan@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Imagine running doom on pen and paper

[–] jve@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

My carpel tunnel acted up when I read this.