this post was submitted on 18 Jul 2026
1048 points (99.5% liked)

Programmer Humor

32395 readers
1555 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] HumbleBragger@piefed.social 35 points 3 days ago (3 children)
[–] muhyb@programming.dev 28 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

And their apps refuse to run on custom ROMs or an unlocked bootloader.

[–] Jako302@feddit.org 13 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Banks are the one thing that should use apps. Browsers have too many security issues.

The bigger issue is them using the google integrity bullshit, that's not necessary.

[–] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago

My bank's app hangs and crashes my phone.

[–] HuePony@lemmy.ml 4 points 3 days ago

They should ask to use app, not require it. Users are not babies

[–] DanForever@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

So you never sign into your account on the desktop (browser - I don't believe any banks have window/macos applications)?

[–] bitfucker@programming.dev 2 points 2 days ago

Because whether you agree or not, sandbox is a necessary for banking app. No other app should ever be able to EASILY (emphasis on easily) perform arbitrary read on the banking app data.

[–] bitfucker@programming.dev 1 points 3 days ago

Until web standard can agree to have device bound session, it won't happen. Cookie stealer malware is just too dangerous to perform financial transaction. So maybe for read only stuff it is fine