this post was submitted on 18 Jul 2026
451 points (99.3% liked)

politics

30470 readers
2656 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

President Donald Trump’s approval rating among voters with a high school education or less has fallen to an all-time low, according to new polling, raising fresh questions about whether the president is losing ground with one of his most reliable political constituencies.

The latest figures from Echelon Insights show Trump is now firmly underwater with this group—marking a dramatic reversal from the early months of his second term, when he enjoyed strong positive ratings among less-educated voters.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Windex007@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Not necessarily saying you're wrong... Just pointing out your explanation isn't making direct comparisons.

This chart is "net", which is "approves minus dissaproves", and it's important that you can respond with "neither approves or didsaproves".

So you can have a lower approval rating (32) with a higher NET approval rating, if the "neither approves or dissaproves" chunk is larger.

If a higher approval rating results in a lower net (which is what these numbers are), it generally means more "fence sitters" have definitively shifted to flat-out dissaproval.

So, haven't looked at the data, just noticing your argument seems predicated on a partial understanding of the specific metric this reports on.

[–] gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Not necessarily saying you're wrong

I will, they're dead ass wrong and it's super frustrating because I see this shit everywhere and it comes from a combination of the facts that a) Americans don't get enough education in how to interpret statistics and b) a lot of news media will just cherry pick whatever statistical results they want to tell whatever story they want (e.g. want to make people think the socialist revolution will happen tomorrow, look at what women under 40 think; want to make everyone think Americans are heartless psychopaths, ask independents how Trump is doing on immigration; want to think absolutely nothing has changed, look at GOP approval numbers; etc.)

Look at a bunch of different polls and the directions they've all moved while reading them carefully to see precisely what they're measuring and how and it is absolutely undeniable that most Americans hate our president

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world -1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

The headline clearly states approval rating, not the trend of the delta between approve-disapprove.
You can actually have more or less of both, and have that trend go either way. It's not a good metric.

The net result is the same we've seen so many times before, that in the American population about a third still approve of Trump!! In this case it's even a little higher than the it was a couple of months ago.

[–] gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

The headline states "all time low", which is a trend, which this chart shows

[–] Windex007@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Oh yeah you're right about the headline. I hyperfixated on the graph that was posted which was showing net. My b.