Buffalox

joined 1 year ago
[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 3 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

I wonder how they "know" she tried to buy "Percocet, a prescription painkiller."
If it's true he laced something with fentanyl and sold it as Percocet, then it's absolutely murder.

fentanyl, a deadly synthetic opioid that can be lethal in a dose as small as 2 milligrams

This is absolutely not safe to handle in an illegal black market, no wonder people die so easily. I knew it was dangerous, but this shit is REALLY playing with fire.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 2 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

IDK for sure but I suppose you can circle the display disregarding the app that shows it, and it will do the AI search.
I agree it's a bit far fetched to call it AI display, but what else should they call it?

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 4 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

This should probably have been posted under Android?
The specs sound a lot like 13T, and I'm not sure if this image search is better or more convenient than just using Google lens?
Anyways I love they've kept the flat front, which was a major point in my decision to get the 13T Pro.
Apart from the glass back, I really like the 13T, but in hindsight I think the non pro is better value if you are not a major gamer.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 22 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (15 children)

Yes, but it works best with the original BORG concept, before they introduced the queen.
The BORG was originally described as a collective, and a collective doesn't have rulers like a queen.
So I must admit I was a bit disappointed in the introduction of a BORG queen.
Still the BORG remain a very cool part of Star Trek.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 49 points 1 day ago (17 children)

Personification that changed the original concept for the sake of the story.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 48 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (9 children)

No they are not pro life, and they should never be allowed to use that term or make that claim without protests.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 21 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm European and I own AMD stock, but I don't root for Intel to fail.
It's not only Russia, but also China who is getting more aggressive, we need to stick together now more than ever since WW2.
It's insane that a traitor like Trump has a shot at becoming president of USA!?!?

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 27 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (5 children)

Intel Foundry scores $3B for defense chips
On a busy Monday, Intel also revealed it won up to $3 billion in funding under the CHIPS and Science Act to establish a secretive manufacturing program called the "Secure Enclave."

This is probably the saving grace for Intel, USA will not allow to be dependent on production outside USA, and AFAIK there are no other remaining US foundries left that are remotely competitive with a world leading production process.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

A dispute over how much profit Intel stood to take from each chip sold to the Japanese electronics giant blocked Intel from settling on the price with Sony,

Yeah that's what I thought, Intel simply isn't competitive. For a console SOC the CPU part eats about twice the power of an AMD, and the GPU part cost about twice to make, because it needs twice the die area to compete with AMD on performance. This creates design restrictions, and makes the system more expensive to build.

I'm surprised Intel was even in the game, they'd obviously have to sell at a deficit to compete. Maybe it was to prevent AMD from getting a sweet deal?
If Intel were serious about it, and had confidence in their technologies, they'd have taken a bad deal now, and improved their technologies to make it profitable later. But Intel already has problems with profitability, so maybe they won't take on another loss giving investment.

When AMD took the console business from Nvidia/Intel, they made a cutthroat offer, that Nvidia refused to compete with, and now AMD is dominant and make good money on consoles.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 12 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Look, Kristen, I make a mean chicken curry. I don’t think that it’s insulting for anybody to talk about their dietary preferences

Was it just like locker-room-talk?

This Vance guy was the perfect choice by Trump. Probably the only thing I agree with in his campaign. (S)
And Laura Loomer is right up there competing with him on being the most brilliant. 🤣🤣🤣

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 21 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Ofcourse the cops need to respond

Yes, but then there's the matter of HOW they respond.

 

AOC speech at the 2024 Democratic National Convention

74
submitted 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) by Buffalox@lemmy.world to c/android@lemmy.world
 

My old $200 Motorola G9 Power phone lasted almost 4 years with only very minor scratches. Obviously in that period I have dropped it a few times getting out of the car, where the phone sometimes work itself out of my pant pocket while I drive, and then it slips out when I get out of the car. But no problem on my previous phones, despite the Moto had cheap Panda glass front.

Then I bought my $800 glass back Xiaomi 13T Pro in January, and I loved the phone for the camera and good specs. But alas after only 4 months, and single drop of just 30 cm while sitting on the porch, the glass back immediately cracked! The back now looks like an ugly mess, and the high water resistance is very likely gone too.

For sure the last time I buy a phone with a glass back!!!

I wonder why glass back is so popular, and I curse the media for reviewing the Samsung Galaxy S2 as "feeling a bit cheap", because the back was synthetic, and drop tests showed it was 10 times as durable as the iPhone with its glass back.

Samsung did it right in the beginning, glass backs are a curse.

PS: I don't use condoms for my phones, if they need that for daily use, it's an obvious design flaw!!!

The glass back is supposedly there to give a premium feel to the phone. But because it's fragile, people have to use a cover, but with the cover, the premium feel of a glass back is gone anyways?
How is glass back not a design flaw?

EDIT FOR CLARIFICATION:

I am not clumsy, that's why I believe the phone should be able to last without cover. This was the first time the phone slid out of my packet, and I've NEVER dropped it out of my hands. One 30 cm slip and it's broken. Where for instance my Moto had maybe 4-6 in all over the years, and remained unscathed, apart from some tiny scratches.
The sliding out of pocket does occur maybe a couple of times per year, but it's a low drop, and the phone should absolutely be able to handle that tiny drop, as it's an item for everyday use.
I've also never had problems with scratches on my screen on any phone, which is the reason people use screen protectors I guess, which I don't either, because they are ugly, for instance they create a tiny ring around the camera, and they feel awful IMO, my phone came with it, and it took exactly 10 seconds for me to decide to remove it, because I could feel the edge of the screen protector when using the phone.
But please stop with the dropping my phone regularly comments! Just because I dropped my Moto a few times (slid out of pocket) over almost 4 years! Always from low height, which it should be able to handle a few times.

 

It used to be very convenient that when searching for something that had a geographic location, Google searches used to show a small map which linked to Google maps when pressed.
Now all I get i a tiny useless map, that doesn't have any of the feature of Google maps, and often I don't even get that.
Anyone know why that is? And if there is a fix?
I use Firefox, but I'm guessing it's independent of browser, unless Google is up to their shenanigans again.
I've added Google maps as search option, which luckily is dead easy in Firefox to do. At the same time I added Open Street Map, to minimize Google map use to maybe show them they are losing traffic.

EDIT:

I think this is the reason as u/garrett@lemm.ee writes:

If you’re in Europe, it may be due to the DMA.

https://www.lemonde.fr/en/pixels/article/2024/03/06/digital-markets-act-how-the-way-you-use-google-maps-and-messenger-is-changing_6591969_13.html

You may also have noticed something new on Google, when looking for the address of a place: It’s now impossible to click on the map that appears in your search results.

Google is one of the “gatekeepers” according to the DMA (Digital Markets Act). The law recently went into effect. It is supposed to lessen the amount of preferential treatment the big tech companies give themselves.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_Markets_Act

 

https://www.youtube.com/@Thunderf00t

I considered hard weather this really belongs in Technology, but came to the conclusion that exposing a scammer that is considered a tech genius, does belong here. Because debunking a technology company is as important as showing it, when it's considered valid.

That said, I believe most people here are already aware that Musk is not to be trusted blindly. But just how bad it really is, may be news to some.

1
submitted 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) by Buffalox@lemmy.world to c/android@lemmy.world
 

Hi I had an App previously, that was just called Write for simple note taking, where you could take a picture, and make simple edits, like using a simulated marker to highlight.
I used it for the very simple task, of taking a picture of our shopping list, and then striking things I've purchased, which IMO can be very helpful when you have big shoppinglists, which we tend to have.😋
In principle the standard photo edit on my phone can do it, but it's not very good at it, because it's clumsy to resize and navigate the list.
Obviously I prefer an app that is free and without advertising.
Maybe others will find this helpful too?

view more: next ›