this post was submitted on 19 Jul 2026
304 points (99.0% liked)

Fuck Cars

16203 readers
792 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
toaster@slrpnk.net
grue@lemmy.world
Toaster1@lemmy.world
304
US boxer Hannah Rapp struck and killed by driver while cycling, police say (www.theguardian.com)
submitted 2 days ago by Stern@lemmy.world to c/fuckcars@lemmy.world
38 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

From the article - "The agency said Rapp and a fellow bicyclist were riding on a local road when Medina passed them in his car, stopped, and drove his vehicle in reverse. Medina then hit Rapp, and she was pronounced dead after emergency responders brought her to a hospital."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] imadethis@fedinsfw.app 18 points 1 day ago

Manslaughter is definitely a lesser charge. Usually used if the death was accidental or such.

Just to clarify on this: There are (in english common law typically used in the united states) 5 mental states associate with criminal action: intentional, knowingly, recklessly, with criminal negligence, and accidental (sometimes you'll hear it casually as innocently). There is a great guide on this called 'The illustrated Guide to the Law' that everyone should read. It's a website, just give it a search.

Intentional and knowingly are almost always considered one and the same, because proving that someone committed a crime with the express intent to commit the crime is actually really hard if you are following logic, but proving that someone knew an outcome would be the outcome for the action they took and simply did it anyway is a much easier task. Intentionally and knowingly are the mental states associated with what most of us would call murder.

Recklessly is associated with what texas is calling manslaughter. Recklessly boils down to you knew that there was a risk of the outcome occurring, and disregarded that risk and did it anyway. In this case, the state will have a MUCH easier time of proving that the driver knew there was a risk involving suddenly stopping on a road and backing up when there were other people/cars/bicyclists around, and simply carried out the risky action anyway.

If you're curious, the last state of criminal negligence is if a reasonable person would know that the action carried a risk, even if the individual doesn't recognize or know the risk.

Oh, and of course accidental means just that. Even a reasonable person wouldn't expect the outcome that occurred, and the person didn't know it. Think about the scenario of backing up from your driveway after checking behind you before even getting into the car to make sure no one is on your driveway, but one of those wild runaway prams got behind your car as you started to back up, and you knock it over and the baby falls out, hits its head, and dies.