Work Reform

16915 readers

257 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

All workers must be paid a living wage for their labor.
Income inequality is the main cause of lower living standards.
Workers must join together and fight back for what is rightfully theirs.
We must not be divided and conquered. Workers gain the most when they focus on unifying issues.

Our Goals

Higher wages for underpaid workers.
Better worker representation, including but not limited to unions.
Better and fewer working hours.
Stimulating a massive wave of worker organizing in the United States and beyond.
Organizing and supporting political causes and campaigns that put workers first.

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

kat_angstrom@lemmy.world

Workers Need a Legal Right to Full-Time Hours (jacobin.com)

submitted 20 hours ago by return2ozma@lemmy.world to c/workreform@lemmy.world

5 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Half or more of workers at companies like Starbucks, Target, and Kohl’s are working part-time hours — in Starbucks’s case, one hour fewer per week than they would need to qualify for benefits.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Deconceptualist@leminal.space 14 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Normalize 32 hours as full-time with benefits.

Actually, folks should get benefits at 20 hours. People with young kids or something else major going on in their lives would be better able to work then.

[–] antlion@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 14 hours ago

24 hours is the perfect full time amount. That’s three 8h shifts, or four 6h shifts (without lunch), or maybe even two 12h shifts.