this post was submitted on 21 Jul 2026
471 points (93.9% liked)

Games

49862 readers
991 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Rules

1. Submissions have to be related to games

Video games, tabletop, or otherwise. Posts not related to games will be deleted.

This community is focused on games, of all kinds. Any news item or discussion should be related to gaming in some way.

2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

No bigotry, hardline stance. Try not to get too heated when entering into a discussion or debate.

We are here to talk and discuss about one of our passions, not fight or be exposed to hate. Posts or responses that are hateful will be deleted to keep the atmosphere good. If repeatedly violated, not only will the comment be deleted but a ban will be handed out as well. We judge each case individually.

3. No excessive self-promotion

Try to keep it to 10% self-promotion / 90% other stuff in your post history.

This is to prevent people from posting for the sole purpose of promoting their own website or social media account.

4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

This community is mostly for discussion and news. Remember to search for the thing you're submitting before posting to see if it's already been posted.

We want to keep the quality of posts high. Therefore, memes, funny videos, low-effort posts and reposts are not allowed. We prohibit giveaways because we cannot be sure that the person holding the giveaway will actually do what they promise.

5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

Make sure to mark your stuff or it may be removed.

No one wants to be spoiled. Therefore, always mark spoilers. Similarly mark NSFW, in case anyone is browsing in a public space or at work.

6. No linking to piracy

Don't share it here, there are other places to find it. Discussion of piracy is fine.

We don't want us moderators or the admins of lemmy.world to get in trouble for linking to piracy. Therefore, any link to piracy will be removed. Discussion of it is of course allowed.

Authorized Regular Threads

Related communities

PM a mod to add your own

Video games

Generic

Help and suggestions

By platform

By type

By games

Language specific

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] DanceMomsSavedMe@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

"I don't agree to the terms of your storefront and I won't sell it there"

Also, many games release on PlayStation and Xbox that are digital only and have no discs. This has existed since PS3.

Do you know how many exclusives are only on Steam?

Same way with gog's DRM free stance which is why people get upset they don't have every single game that comes out, its the publishers choice.

The freedom to make that choice is important.

For what you described to have any merit you would have to force companies to sell their games on all gaming storefronts which will never happen and shouldn't because that is anti consumer and anti business all at the same time.

Same way with Denuvo. If a company wants that shit in their game they can do that and I can choose not to buy it until they remove it. But no one should ever try to force that across the board.

It would be different if PlayStation and Xbox had always been digital but they haven't. They are taking a consumer choice and right (reselling a disc) away by this decision. That's why people are pissed.

The ability to release your game only digitally with no disc has ALWAYS existed.

And no your imagined fantasy scenario of the photographer would not be right.

I am starting to think maybe you are saying PlayStation shouldn't be forced to make discs and the fact is that they ARENT digital only has always existed and they just said they are stopping making discs with no court cases or forcing their hand and it will stay that way they get to do whatever they want.

Thing is, people who have been with them since 1994 have a right to be pissed off about an anti consumer move like this.

If my wife fucks another dude at the bar I'm going to bitch about it very vocally so she knows I'm unhappy and leave her. That's kind of like this. You have a right to do something and people have a right to react the way they want to about it short of violence.

Sony has a right not to produce discs but I also have the right to call out that greedy decision for what it is and never buy from them again. No one is forcing publishers to do shit and they never have.

I would not agree with some sort of law that FORCES Sony to keep making discs but I would agree with their customers bitching enough about it that they choose to change course.

If they decide not to I'll just decide not to use them anymore. As someone who owns over 500 games on PlayStation though I absolutely have the right to call them out on their bullshit a spade is a spade and Sony is a greedy anti consumer company at this point. Used to love them.

[–] TimothyOilypants@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They are taking a consumer choice and right (reselling a disc) away by this decision. That’s why people are pissed.

You NEVER owned the game, only the media. See my other response about the legal EULA that have been included with every game you have ever purchased. Studios and publishers have no moral or legal duty to sell you a piece of plastic.

If you disagree philosophically, don't buy games from studios and publishers who don't distribute physical media...

However unhappy you are about this decision, it does NOT give you the legal or moral authority to DEMAND that an artist create art in the medium of your choice. I suspect the only reason that this vocal minority is kicking up a fuss is because they realize that the industry doesn't care, because they can still thrive without your business.

No one is going to hold the entire industry back because you and a miniscule minority are too cheap, or afraid to move forward.

[–] DanceMomsSavedMe@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Ok not owning that games intellectual property affected my ability to choose and resell a disc in what way?

You are thinking that I seem to think when I buy a disc that I OWN this game. I can make copies, I can make a sequal, I can fucking get a percentage of sales from it.

No dude. I could RESELL the license that existed on that disc that couldn't be revoked.

Do you understand that? I feel like you are not understanding what I am saying here seriously.

Also I just said I didn't want anyone to demand or legally force them to do that is English not your first language or something?

Discs have existed since ps1 and digital only editions of PlayStation games have existed since PS3 no one is forcing shit.

People are rightfully calling Sony anti consumer for this move and upset that a gaming company they used to love would screw their customers like this.

I am not saying they should be legally required to do shit and they won't be. Sony can do whatever it wants but the customers who have been with them for years can call them out on it being bullshit too.

[–] TimothyOilypants@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I guess I just don't understand your point then, so lets walk through it and see if you can state a definitive point.

  • You prefer to own discs so you can sell them.
  • You you acknowledge that owning a disk does not mean that you own of have control over the intellectual proprty.
  • You agree that it would be wrong to try and REQUIRE someone to distribute their art on disc if they didn't want to?

Call them out all you want, but can you at least acknowledge that your opinion is a minority opinion?

[–] DanceMomsSavedMe@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

"I was hoping Lemmy gaming communities would be better than reddit"

Seems like YOU are the minority opinion, eh?

And yes, just like I said before digital only options have always been up to the publisher. Hundreds of games get released on PlayStation without a disc version. No one is forcing shit.

Also my point that you seem to be intentionally missing is that if you buy a game license digitally you get to have it taken away when the company decides they want to and can't resell it

When you buy it on disc they have to come and pry it out of your dead cold hands before they can make you stop playing it.

Again since I know you really want this all to not be true, online only games are different. I have always referred to single player games when talking about discs in these comments

[–] TimothyOilypants@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Also my point that you seem to be intentionally missing is that if you buy a game license digitally you get to have it taken away when the company decides they want to and can’t resell it

I have no problem with this. Such is the ephemeral nature of art. If my enjoyment comes from that act of possession and not experience then I should probably collect Funko Pops and not video games.

[–] DanceMomsSavedMe@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Yes and that's why your opinion is minority.

A medium exists right now to avoid that kind of corporate fuckery and its physical discs. Which is why people are upset about it.

When I buy a licesne devs and publishers got paid. No one should be able to take that away from me and once they do I always pirate it so I can keep it forever. I fucking BOUGHT it. (A LICENSE YOU DON'T OWN!!! yes yes you have said).

It would be different if they let you rent it. They don't want to do that though huh? Why? Its a license either way. The answer is greedy fucks in suits. Not the devs that work their asses off on these games.

They would rightfully get fucking grilled trying to rent something for $70 but that's exactly what they do with digital only purchases.

Steam let's me still download games that get delisted that I legally purchased a license for. Is that wrong of steam? Should they be legally forced to not do that?

I can tell you worked with the console companies before like you alluded to in your other comment, because this kind of anti consumer line of thinking they reward and are known for.

[–] TimothyOilypants@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yes and that’s why your opinion is minority.

Facts don't support that assessment.

There are an estimated 3,700,000,000 people on earth who regularly play video games.

  • What percentage of those people do you think read gaming journalism?
  • How many engage in video game discourse online?
  • How many do you think even understand terms like EULA, MTX, always-online, DRM, etc.?
  • How many do you think care about physical media?

What you are experiencing is combination of false consensus and confirmation bias.

[–] DanceMomsSavedMe@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

How do you have the authority to know that my opinion is minority opinion, then?

"It isn't ME that's wrong, its Lemmy, reddit, twitter, PlayStation blog, Facebook, etc. Was hoping [insert community here] would be different"

I know that the majority of PlayStation gamers don't support this because they deleted the PlayStation blogpost that they announced this on because of all the backlash. They've been community noted on every tweet they've put out since for their anti consumer bs.

Community notes on twitter are majority opinion at least on that platform.

[–] TimothyOilypants@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

How many people do you think there are online complaining about this? 1,000,000? 10,000,000?

Let's be unreasonably generous and say that 100,000,000 people are online right now, incensed by this move! That's 2.7% of gamers.

At least TRY and put your opinions into some kind of perspective before acting like they are universal truths...

[–] DanceMomsSavedMe@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Wll I mean if we're just going off the perspectives being offered online the ONLY person I've seen defend this is you, who worked with console companies in the past.

On the other hand even entire development and retail companies with huge skin in the game like Nippon Ichi Software, Atari, Iam8bit, and the Entertainment Retailers Association have voiced that they are against this.

Wanna know what's even better? Sony did this without telling a single one of their partners they were going to do this. And you trust them to make the right moves with the things I buy from them? They don't even respect their fucking publishers and retail partners.

So far only companies I can find FOR this decision are the ones you have worked for which, color me shocked, think that they are making the right decision!

[–] TimothyOilypants@lemmy.ca 0 points 6 days ago (1 children)

There is no right or wrong decision... still lost on the concept of subjectivity eh?

[–] DanceMomsSavedMe@lemmy.zip 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Yes there is. The wrong decision is the one that is anti consumer as Sony will learn in the following years after this is implemented.

[–] TimothyOilypants@lemmy.ca 0 points 6 days ago (1 children)

So you speak for all 3,700,000,000 gamers? So confident.

[–] DanceMomsSavedMe@lemmy.zip 1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

Yes. I speak for every industry in the entire world that being anti consumer is the wrong decision.

Maybe not short term which you seem to have trouble thinking past, but long term yes.

You speak for all console gamers when you say physical ownership doesn't matter, or just the console companies you used to work with/for?

Also, you seem to not understand that a companies decisions doesn't have to be based off what people want. If it did, there wouldn't be any anti consumer decisions ever because by its very definition anti consumer is against the consumer.

Also, last I checked all 3.7gorillian gamers don't all play on PlayStation

[–] TimothyOilypants@lemmy.ca 0 points 6 days ago (1 children)

There's really no in continuing any discussion if you truly believe it's not possible for other consumers to have different values, opinions, or perspectives than you do.

No one will ever be able to reason you out of an opinion you arrived at through unreasonable means.

[–] DanceMomsSavedMe@lemmy.zip 0 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Are you unable to comprehend that anti consumer means against the consumer?

By its very definition it is not what consumers want.

Or it would be called, PRO consumer.

You aren't a consumer only you also work for these people. Color me shocked you hold anti consumer opinions.

[–] TimothyOilypants@lemmy.ca 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Are you unable to comprehend that you are not the model consumer that all definitions should be based on?

As you pointed out, I am also a consumer. I prefer digital media and think the abandonment of physical media cannot come soon enough. We already have enough microplastic, we don't need more.

[–] DanceMomsSavedMe@lemmy.zip 0 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Which would be awesome if PlayStation made pro consumer choices like Valve does letting you keep downloading copies you paid for. But since they don't, them taking away the only way that existed for them not to fuck you over is anti consumer.

I think I misunderstood that you were saying its not right or wrong based off the opinion of gamers. When I say I am speaking for all gamers and all industries, I'm talking about anti consumer practices (like taking back copies of movies and games you pay for like they just did last month and willnextmonth again for ps3) being not good for gaming.

Individual gamers will vary on opinion of that. Doesn't change that it is objectively an anti consumer move for Sony to be making.

Also if you really are against microplastics stop sucking the dick of companies and saying its ok for them to take back copies from you that you bought like you did in other comments.

If they would still let you download stuff you bought like steam does already, then no one would be upset about discs.

They are upset it because Sony has a proven track record of taking stuff away and not lettih you download it anymore, unlike more pro consumer companies like Steam that don't do shit like that.

[–] TimothyOilypants@lemmy.ca 0 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I don't care if games disappear. If the studio who owns the IP doesn't want to pay to have it hosted any more that's ok by me, its their choice. Steam absorbs the cost because they absolutely hose studios on their publishing agreements...

[–] DanceMomsSavedMe@lemmy.zip 1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

They take the same 30% that PlayStation, Xbox, and GOG take.

So if they can afford it so can PlayStation.

Its not the studio who hosts it its the PS store and steam and Xbox who run the download servers.

And again, it isn't the publisher that chooses to take a copy you own or they would tell Steam to stop. It is the store that you bought it on that chooses to do that. PlayStation and Xbox choose to do that, steam doesn't which is why no one ever raised hell about steam having non physical (minus like, two or 3 games they made long ago) because they know when they buy it on steam they can download it forever or at least until Gabe dies.

If you are really for the end of micropladtics you should be supporting pro consumer choices that make people WANT digital, just like steam is doing. Not the ability to take something away you bought at a whim like Sony does all the time.

[–] TimothyOilypants@lemmy.ca 0 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

No. Steam elects to absorb the lifetime hosting costs and builds a perpetual license into the publishing deal.

All Sony and MS licensing deals are time bound and the developer/publisher is responsible for hosting costs. When the publisher doesn't want to pay anymore, the title gets taken down.

[–] DanceMomsSavedMe@lemmy.zip 0 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

Just googled it and no, they don't do that.

Do you have a source for that? Sony says they take 30% cut. You pay via revenue share of a cut of game sales and not recurring maintenance costs.

So nope. Sony being anti consumer isn't because of their licensing agreement here. They take the same exact split that steam does for the same reasons. They don't pay for download hosting on the PS store or steam store except for that 30% revenue split.

Which highlights again why people are pissed. It isn't about the discs really, its about Sony fucking people and taking what they bought away with a proven track record of doing just that. The discs were just the only way to prevent them from doing that.

[–] TimothyOilypants@lemmy.ca 0 points 6 days ago (1 children)

"Trust me bro, I googled it!"

And what happens when the developer/publishers licenses (middleware, brands/teams, music, etc) expire?

[–] DanceMomsSavedMe@lemmy.zip 0 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Provide the source for your claims and prove me wrong.

No? Ah. Didn't think so.

[–] TimothyOilypants@lemmy.ca 0 points 6 days ago (1 children)
[–] DanceMomsSavedMe@lemmy.zip 0 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

You can't lookup Sony's terms and conditions for publishers on their website like I just did?

You're so full of shit I can smell you from here.

Can't accept when you're wrong huh?

[–] TimothyOilypants@lemmy.ca 0 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Again... You don't work in the industry, you don't know anyone who works in the industry... You're just talking out your ass on the internet.

If you want to fight for justice, pick up brick and go fuck up one of your local Nazis...

Whining about video games on the internet doesn't make you brave, it makes you simple.

[–] DanceMomsSavedMe@lemmy.zip 0 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Sources or shut the fuck up.

You work for these people it doesn't make you brave defending your masters.

It makes me right that you can't even prove what you say true, though.

You should be upset more about it.

[–] TimothyOilypants@lemmy.ca 0 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Sure it does. If you truly thought you were right you would disengage...

[–] DanceMomsSavedMe@lemmy.zip 0 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

Sources or shut the fuck up.

Back up what you say and prove yourself.

[–] TimothyOilypants@lemmy.ca 0 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

I owe your rage nothing...

Expect no further replies, continued harassment will be reported.