this post was submitted on 28 Jul 2026
633 points (98.3% liked)
Technology
87869 readers
3310 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
What is a rare book, exactly? Why can't the publishers just print more if there is demand for them?
Maybe theyre from publishers that have since folded, and the original plates or print-copies are lost in some storage yard, or a tip face.
It depends on why the books is rare, some books are rare because they are not popular while other because they were banned. For example I know a novel were the English translation is easily available, but the original language is rare because it was banned in the original language in multiple countries. Don't forget collecter artbooks that were never digitised.
Keep in mind that books often become culturally important decades after their print run, sometimes when the copyright is ambiguous.
And also keep in mind there are technically, an insane number of "rare" books out there, but important rare books might only be important to people without the money to pay for another printing.
I could almost forgive this prrocess if they were /also/ archiving these books (leven if limited ike Google books does), but they won't, because they are so focussed on staying ahead of compeditors based on the "knowledge" in their training data.
Well, I'd be surprised if they're throwing away the digitized versions, they will want to use them in training all of their future models. If they go bankrupt maybe someone more willing to share will get the data
Im assuming for pre digital era books, they don't have the equipment (printing plate) anymore. But yes, presumably anybody could just print the scans with a modern printer?
Yes... If they were archiving their scans. Which isn't happening.
I have this great book about all the glassware in use in 1940s chemistry.
As someone whose entire library is focused on the history of science: what's the citation?
https://exhibitdb.cmog.org/opacimages/Images/Pyrex/Rakow_1000132877.pdf
Lots of them are uninteresting and useless to 99.99% of people IIRC (examples I saw in a French article a few months ago was very precise history of some random villages in Spain or something similarly ultra specific)
When destroying books, we don't actually know what will be important in the future. That's why archivists spend so much time archiving mineutia without trying to curate. Those are different jobs and you can't curate for the future.
Yeah I'm not saying these books are objectively uninteresting and useless and that they should be destroyed to feed some water-hungry plagiarism machine, but that is why they are not being re printed : barely anyone is buying them (despite them being rare)