this post was submitted on 30 Jul 2026
680 points (97.6% liked)

Science Memes

20826 readers
1067 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.


Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 0x0@lemmy.zip 1 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

since it takes a long time to design, permit and build them properly.

That's been rigged by design due to... interests... it doesn't take that long to build one.

[–] cynar@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Fully agreed, though it's also something you really don't want done on too much of an accelerated timeline. Rushing the construction, when the fail-safes rely on it, and it will be an absolute bitch to fix later, is a poor plan.

Unfortunately the red tape has become far too risk adverse. E.g. the reactors china is now building were designed in the UK. The UK government killed 5 attempts to get them built through red tape and time killing. Eventually a Chinese scientist found out about the plans. (With permission) he contacted the Chinese government. Sufficient to say, those plans formed the basis for the newer Chinese reactors they are building out now. They are also exporting the expertise, since most western countries have had their skilled engineers reach retirement, before passing on their skills and knowledge.

In practice, you are looking at 5-10 years minimum, from site selection to power on.

[–] 0x0@lemmy.zip 2 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

True

In practice, you are looking at 5-10 years minimum, from site selection to power on.

Still beats 20.

[–] cynar@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago

Very true. It unfortunately doesn't include the delays from bureaucracies throwing excessive red tape at the project, with the goal of, if not killing it, kicking the decision down the road till it's someone else's problem. The UK government has been problematic on that front.

I might be an optimistic pessimist.