this post was submitted on 02 Aug 2026
1349 points (97.5% liked)

Work Reform

17301 readers
2859 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

If you need a hammer or a torque wrench or a truck to do an ongoing job, compensation for that job must be sufficient to pay for the continuing maintenance and eventual replacement of that hammer, torque wrench, or truck.

If you hire a human to do a job, compensation for that job must be sufficient to fully meet that human's basic needs. They need to be earning enough to be a fully functional member of society, not an impoverished charity case. They need at least a living wage, where they don't have to choose between excessive employment or going without. A living wage (or better) is not exploitative.

Generally speaking, cashiers aren't earning a living wage, let alone a gainful wage. Cashiers are generally exploited.

As minimum wages go up, so will prices,

There's a glaring flaw in your analysis. Increasing minimum wage increases effective purchasing power much faster than it increases prices.