this post was submitted on 02 Aug 2026
1347 points (97.5% liked)

Work Reform

17272 readers
391 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] just2look@lemmy.zip 160 points 3 weeks ago (18 children)

It seems like they will just mark everything up by 10% and then give that discount at self checkout. So they will pocket even more while harming those who don't use self checkout.

Or eliminating cashiers altogether.

[–] ALoafOfBread@lemmy.ml 50 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (10 children)

It also doesn't really make sense to do it as a percentage. A cashier's wage is typically hourly, and the labor market has settled on a particular wage for cashiers in this area - say $15/hr.

If I have a $150 grocery bill, a 10% discount would be $15. For maybe 5 minutes of work. Working out to an hourly wage of $180/hr (60/5 = 12, 12 * 15 = 180).

So if they're saying "we should be compensating customers for being made to do labor", they'd be compensating them at roughly 12x the going rate for cashiers in this example.

Now if it's just meant to be punitive, OK. But then why not actually address the real issue: displacement of workers by technology and passing the labor burden on to unpaid consumers - either make that illegal or tax the company to help mitigate the harm it's causing by eliminating jobs.

[–] Armok_the_bunny@lemmy.world 34 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

For the last point, it is easier to tax unfavored behavior into the ground than it is to outright forbid it. That's why sin taxes exist after all.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 11 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (4 children)

I don't think it would be difficult to outright forbid self-checkout at all, actually.

There's a difference between enforcing laws on individuals and enforcing laws on businesses. Businesses can't exactly run and hide, if they're using self-checkout they're going to get found out. That's distinct from something like the drug trade, which is all underground and hidden.

[–] teslekova@sh.itjust.works 13 points 2 weeks ago (6 children)

Some people fucking love self checkout. If you ban it, you'll have disability advocacy groups up your arse on behalf of autistic people and others with social anxiety.

[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 10 points 2 weeks ago

ADA compliance will kill the entire thing. You can't charge someone for accommodation of a disability that prevents them from using the self checkout. All the human-staffed registers will be posted as handicap accessible, and they will default to the "discounted" self-checkout price.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (17 replies)
[–] lemonhead2@lemmy.world 92 points 3 weeks ago (9 children)

honestly just cap executive pay. nothing they can do then

[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 21 points 3 weeks ago (31 children)

In fact, let's just screw the whole thing and seize the means of production...

load more comments (31 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] mechoman444@lemmy.world 89 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (7 children)

That "$300 billion" number is just completely made up. The math doesn't even remotely work.

The entire US grocery industry does somewhere around $1 trillion in revenue per year. For self-checkout to save $300 billion, that would mean roughly a third of every dollar spent on groceries was going directly to cashier wages. That is obviously not how grocery stores operate. Total labor costs for a store are only a fraction of their expenses.

And the idea that self-checkout was some massive money-saving miracle ignores the other side of the equation. Those systems cost a lot upfront, require maintenance, and they increase losses from theft, missed scans, and mistakes. A machine replacing a cashier doesn't magically eliminate costs; it just moves them somewhere else.

There is a reason companies like Walmart, Target, and Dollar General have started putting limits on self-checkout or bringing back more staffed lanes. If self-checkout was saving them hundreds of billions, they wouldn't be walking it back. They would be installing them everywhere they could.

This is the kind of post that hurts any community built around open discussion and critical thinking. A sensational claim gets repeated because it supports a certain viewpoint, while nobody stops to ask if it is actually true. The truth should matter regardless of whether it supports corporations, consumers, or anyone else. Being intellectually honest means checking the facts first, not just accepting information because it confirms what we already believe.

On a side note, totally support the bill in every way.

[–] solidus@lemmy.world 33 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

I really thought leaving Reddit would reduce the occurrence of this but honestly it was naive of me. This sort of clickbait crap is everywhere including Lemmy. Its unfortunate

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Oijkuij@lemmy.world 14 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

To further add some numbers (and their source) to this, the average grocery cashier makes $15-16 an hour, or liberally $35k a year. Note that this isn't the entire cost of a cashier, the checkout equipment and POS systems cost money too - let's assume that and the automatic checkout system are in the same order of magnitude. There were about 800k grocery store cashiers in the US in 2017 (source) so that's about $28 billion, or ~3% of that proposed $1T revenue.

Many factors not included in this calc, more importantly regional variations in costs. Food prices and wages are higher than average in NY, 10% might not be pretty well calculated for that state. Also, human employees must be insured/have benefits, and machines do not require this. That cost savings on stores isn't in the calculus here.

Also a huge fan of holding food chains accountable for fair pricing. Hope this becomes effective!

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] NateNate60@lemmy.world 56 points 3 weeks ago (16 children)

This is a good intentioned, well-principled idea, but it's a ham-fisted implementation that isn't going to have the intended effect and extremely easy to work around.

load more comments (16 replies)
[–] Adalast@lemmy.world 45 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Can we go for upcharges on food items for modifying them next? If you are going to charge me $0.30 for adding tomatoes to a sandwich, you better damn well reduce the price by $0.30 when I remove tomatoes from a sandwich.

This is getting so out of hand in the USA.

[–] bitchkat@lemmy.world 12 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Oh that's one of my gripes. My son likes to get an egg mcmuffin with no meat, extra cheese. You'd think the slice of meat and cheese would cancel each other out. And I think they are up to charging $1 for a slice of american cheese. And its been this way for over 15 years.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Nemo@midwest.social 42 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Fun fact: With very little effort, you can give yourself a discount at checkout!

Unethical corporations are humanity's predators and we should hurt them however we can.

[–] PalmTreeIsBestTree@lemmy.world 13 points 2 weeks ago

I grab my zero dollar curtesy gum every time I am at one.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BeUnique@lemmy.zip 31 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I didn't have to do a whole research paper on this to know that if I'm doing somebody else's job as a customer, the company is saving money.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 27 points 2 weeks ago (7 children)

This is why I try to avoid self checkout. If I'm getting like 2 things and there's already a line, sure, maybe.... But if the lines are short, even if I only have a couple of things, I'll visit a real cashier.

Not because I need help with it, and not because I want to "stick it to the man" or anything. I want to be part of the metric that continues to justify that a cashier is still a position to keep, and pay someone for. I do it so that there will still be cashier's in the future, and someone can put food on their table because I didn't choose to do free labor for the 0.1%.

I know, I know. I'm so selfish, I should tHiNk oF ThE sHaReHoLdErS....

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] acchariya@lemmy.world 23 points 2 weeks ago (6 children)

The discount comes from entering the code of the cheapest type of item no matter what item I picked up. Organic lady finger bananas? Looks like bulk Cavendish to me. I'm not being paid enough to know the difference when I'm using self checkout, a banana is a banana.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] DudleyMason@lemmy.ml 22 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Ok, but since they're too cowardly to implement real price controls they just raised the price of everything by 10%.

[–] Tiger666@lemmy.ca 13 points 2 weeks ago (6 children)

Exactly.

Another increase in the cost of living because of self serve checkouts. Can we just nationalize all corporation right now and divvy them up later?

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] MSids@lemmy.world 21 points 2 weeks ago (7 children)

There may be an unintended consequence of this. Corpos love to optimize to minimize any hits to their bottom line.

I could see any of these possibilities as a reaction:

  • Self checkouts become overwhelmed so stores remove remaining paid cashiers to add more self checkout lanes.
  • Self checkouts are reduced or removed to avoid giving any discounts.
  • I believe I read that grocery margins are thin at the store and are much higher for manufacturers. I could see stores increasing prices across the board to recoup costs.

Hard to know for sure, the people seem to just rarely get a W these days that isn’t immediately wiped out by something else.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 21 points 2 weeks ago

Personally, I greatly prefer these anyway.

As someone with social anxiety and ADHD, standing in line with a ton of people and then having to interact with a cashier is something I love to avoid.

That being said, I wouldn't mind a discount at all 😁

[–] Magnus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

They will increase prices by 10% to offset this.

[–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 12 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Grocery prices have gone up 25% to 30% since 2020. It has been at least three full years since the pandemic was declared over. And food prices have gone up at around 10% since then.

They don't need an excuse to add 10%, they're doing it anyway.

Sources:

https://americandefault.org/statistics/grocery-price-increase-since-2020/

https://www.ers.usda.gov/amber-waves/2025/june/food-price-inflation-slowed-in-2023-and-2024

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ToiletFlushShowerScream@piefed.world 17 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

300 billion in pure profits to executives… that could have ended hunger in the US last year.

So the next time you use the self checkout, remember to glance over at the lone cashier who lives in your neighborhood, look them in the eye and make sure they know about your excitement to be working for the shareholders for free now instead of their former colleagues. And if on the drive home you see their former colleague is getting evicted because they were laid off, make sure to honk, lean out your window and let them know how much you enjoyed the sweet song of “unexpected item in the bagging area.”

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] DonkeyStar@lemmy.world 15 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Holy shit, that’s more than the employee discount I got working in retail.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ChristerMLB@piefed.social 13 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

I'd say that self-checkouts are fundamentally a good thing, just like other forms of increased productivity are a good thing – but in today's society they can both lead to unemployment and lower wages. That is unnecessary.

[–] moopet@sh.itjust.works 18 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Employment for the sake of employment isn't a good thing, though. The problem that's trying to solve is people not having enough money to live, which has multiple better solutions than makework.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Nonconfrontational@lemmy.ml 12 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (46 children)

How about food is a human right and should be free at point of purchase, lol.

Edit: lmao at the three American or Israeli downvoters. Eat shit, fuckers.

[–] gandalf_der_13te@feddit.org 17 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

i think it would be better to give universal basic income (money) and people buy food with that. why is it better? because it ensures that while people can afford food, one person does not buy 20 bread when they only eat 2 "because it's free".

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] HCSOThrowaway@lemmy.world 14 points 2 weeks ago (27 children)

I do think that people should be able to line up to get soup/stew/oatmeal/etc. low-cost food as much as they want.

Kids shouldn't be distracted from their schoolwork and even having their brains and bodies develop poorly because they don't get fed at home.

Adults shouldn't be distracted at work and/or committing crime to feed their families.

load more comments (27 replies)
load more comments (44 replies)
[–] elucubra@sopuli.xyz 10 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

EU should take note.

Unless I'm in a huge hurry I'll wait in the cashier queue, to do my tiny bit to help preserve jobs.

[–] BorgDrone@feddit.nl 27 points 2 weeks ago (12 children)

Jobs aren’t something to be preserved, that’s the wrong way of thinking about it. Jobs are a waste of everyone’s time. You’re not saving a job, you’re spending labour. The goal should be to eliminate all jobs.

The problem is the link between income and work, that should be eliminated.

load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Steve 10 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

I understand, even agree with the principal.
But don't grocery stores average low single digit margins? A universal 10% discount might not be workable. Unless the point is to eliminate self-checkout. But then why not simply do that?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 10 points 2 weeks ago

I'm very much in favor of this. They place the burden of work on the customers, so they should compensate them.

load more comments
view more: next ›