this post was submitted on 07 Aug 2026
134 points (97.2% liked)

politics

30707 readers
2391 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

When the Democratic National Committee at long last released its "autopsy" report on former Vice President Kamala Harris' loss in the 2024 election in May, one of the most puzzling aspects was the lack of any conclusions related to her and former President Joe Biden's support for Israel's genocide in Gaza.

Holly Otterbein of Axios reported on Thursday that the document's author, Paul Rivera, did indeed look into the issue of Gaza and found it had a role in Harris’ loss. But he did not submit the findings to the DNC for inclusion in the report. Axios did not include an explanation for that decision.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

The DNC leadership changes every four years...

The current DNC chair has been saying this the entire time, and no one listened to him. Instead, people kept claiming without any evidence that the chair hid it despite him supporting pro-Palistine candidates like El-Sayed and Mamdani more than literally any prior chair.

It would appear that you are the one that is out touch with what's actually happening...

And the outdated information about the party months before an important general election could cause actual damage, helping not just trump but also the neoliberals.

So I gotta ask:

Why do you care enough to comment like that, but not enough to actually find out what's happening with the party?

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

If Ken martin was so out of touch that he didnt recognize that genocide support played a role in the last election then why is he qualified to lead the DNC at all? And if we are to pretend that he only just now has the clue that it was part of the lost election ,why isnt he saying so and working on it, hrm? He created a task force and called for unrestricted aid. Thats him trying to take both sides rather than addressing the issue like his voters want. You cant have it both ways givesomefucks. Either it was a key reason for the loss and needs to be addressed with real action, or its wasnt an issue in the last election. Which is it.

Martin knew the entire time that gaza was an issue. He just doesnt want to lose aipac donations. And that is the reasons dems lost and will continue to lose, despite your cheerleading on the sidelines. Your opinion here wont lead to election wins. I dont know how many lost elections you and the DNC need to see to understand this. No genocide, no zionists. Period.

[–] Corvidae@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

And the outdated information about the party months before an important general election could cause actual damage, helping not just trump but also the neoliberals.

Huh? The date on this news item is Aug 7, 2026. How is that out of date? Moving on to your next point, the nearing election, I seem to hear you saying that pushing republicans out of government during the next election is dependent upon censorship? Huh?

I just checked the writer of the article, Stephen Prager, it seems he has a left, progressive bias, though admittedly it was just a brief look at search results. You seem to be losing on all points of analysis, can you better explain so we know what you're trying to say?

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

The DNC leadership is famously out of touch

That is outdated information.

You want to say Jamie Harrison who fixed the primary for Biden then forced Harris down our throats was out of touch?

I agree 100% and was saying that his entire term as chair.

The chair that was seated in February 2025, wants more candidates like Mamdani and El-Sayed and he believes they're are the future of the party...

Do you think that position is out of touch with the American electorate?

[–] Corvidae@lemmy.world 3 points 23 hours ago

Fair enough. I misunderstood you. Thanks for the explanation.

[–] I_Jedi@lemmy.today -1 points 1 day ago

I get my information from God directly. Very efficient that way.