Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
I mean... no shit? Hiding under that desk until a week before the election probably didn't help much either.
You'd have to be hiding under a rock not to already know this anyway.
and the centrist dems still wont talk about it.
"Aktually, the people who rejected our fascist genocide are to blame for fascism"
The DNC leadership is famously out of touch, so that's pretty in character for them.
The DNC leadership changes every four years...
The current DNC chair has been saying this the entire time, and no one listened to him. Instead, people kept claiming without any evidence that the chair hid it despite him supporting pro-Palistine candidates like El-Sayed and Mamdani more than literally any prior chair.
It would appear that you are the one that is out touch with what's actually happening...
And the outdated information about the party months before an important general election could cause actual damage, helping not just trump but also the neoliberals.
So I gotta ask:
Why do you care enough to comment like that, but not enough to actually find out what's happening with the party?
If Ken martin was so out of touch that he didnt recognize that genocide support played a role in the last election then why is he qualified to lead the DNC at all? And if we are to pretend that he only just now has the clue that it was part of the lost election ,why isnt he saying so and working on it, hrm? He created a task force and called for unrestricted aid. Thats him trying to take both sides rather than addressing the issue like his voters want. You cant have it both ways givesomefucks. Either it was a key reason for the loss and needs to be addressed with real action, or its wasnt an issue in the last election. Which is it.
Martin knew the entire time that gaza was an issue. He just doesnt want to lose aipac donations. And that is the reasons dems lost and will continue to lose, despite your cheerleading on the sidelines. Your opinion here wont lead to election wins. I dont know how many lost elections you and the DNC need to see to understand this. No genocide, no zionists. Period.
And the outdated information about the party months before an important general election could cause actual damage, helping not just trump but also the neoliberals.
Huh? The date on this news item is Aug 7, 2026. How is that out of date? Moving on to your next point, the nearing election, I seem to hear you saying that pushing republicans out of government during the next election is dependent upon censorship? Huh?
I just checked the writer of the article, Stephen Prager, it seems he has a left, progressive bias, though admittedly it was just a brief look at search results. You seem to be losing on all points of analysis, can you better explain so we know what you're trying to say?
The DNC leadership is famously out of touch
That is outdated information.
You want to say Jamie Harrison who fixed the primary for Biden then forced Harris down our throats was out of touch?
I agree 100% and was saying that his entire term as chair.
The chair that was seated in February 2025, wants more candidates like Mamdani and El-Sayed and he believes they're are the future of the party...
Do you think that position is out of touch with the American electorate?
Fair enough. I misunderstood you. Thanks for the explanation.
I get my information from God directly. Very efficient that way.
It would not surprise me one bit if they had an off-the-record agreement to not mention Gaza in the report, no matter what.
But he did not submit the findings to the DNC for inclusion in the report.
Really fucking glad they investigated that...
It was obviously bullshit cuz Martin had the reciepts via an emailed copy.
The guy who wrote it tried to claim the section was included in a single hard copy draft which was literally impossible to prove or not because who hangs on to giant hardcopies forever?
Now all we need, is for voters to realize a bunch of people coming out of the woodwork to kneecap the Dem party months before a general election don't have the best interest of the party in mind...
And since we've got a bunch of progressives this time, it seems very very weird for people to pick now as the time to dissuade people from voting D.
I held my nose for Clinton/Biden/Harris, now that we got some actual progressives suddenly everyone wants to say now voting blue is optional.
Shits like the "we buy gold" commercials. If they're telling you to sell gold, it's the worst time to sell gold. If they're telling you to buy it, it's the worst time.
The same thing is true when oligarch owned media says vote blue no matter who.
If a bunch of billionaires want to tell me it's ok not to vote D this time, that's the biggest sign I need to vote D
Party leadership were cashing huge political (and probably person) checks from Israel (and funded by us tax dollars). There was no way they would have looked at or even admitted the data existed if it meant giving up foreign sourced AIPAC dollars.
The ‘autopsy’ was garbage anyway. Do it right or don’t do it at all.