this post was submitted on 10 Aug 2026
774 points (98.9% liked)

Technology

88041 readers
2867 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Zedstrian@sopuli.xyz 318 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (6 children)

More OEMs should ship devices with Linux as an option, discounted by the Windows license cost.

[–] edgemaster72@lemmy.world 142 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

OEMs: Sorry, best I can do is tripling the amount of pre-installed bloatware that I get kickbacks on, to not only offset the cost but raise profits more

[–] morto@piefed.social 88 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

Here in Brazil, a lot of vendors are offering laptops with linux, but they do this just to offer a lower price, and put the most weird distro possible, that no one knew existed, so everyone who buys have to install their own os. The bad thing about it is that it creates a really bad first impression about linux on common users, who mostly end up asking the tech person from the family to install windows for them

Edit: another random fun fact: in order to offer a lower price, some brands around here also ship laptops with freedos, don't ask me why.

[–] zarathustrad@lemmy.world 39 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Why don't they just install Mint, Zorin, or even xUbuntu (XFCE versions of each)...

That's 3 examples with actual support and a user base >3 edgelord cat bois.

[–] morto@piefed.social 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I ask myself the same question. I have no idea. Mine is from vaio and came with some sort of modded debian that looked like a stripped down win xp with custom repos that didn't even load properly.

[–] mrbutterscotch@feddit.org 5 points 1 month ago

You'd think that installing a niche distro like that is more difficult than one of the big 'plug and play' ones. Meaning they actively put more work into it, how strange.

[–] Dudewitbow@lemmy.zip 16 points 1 month ago (3 children)

im surprised they don't just do the underhanded method of acquiring windows.

well I'd imagine theres some stores willing to oblige doing that.

curious sakes, what distro do they preload on customers.

[–] jaygray91@piefed.zip 4 points 1 month ago

Yeah that's weird. Quite a few of the smaller refurb shops here (south East Asia) just pirate Windows and Office suite.

[–] steelplatedmech@piefed.ca 4 points 1 month ago

Yeah I doubt my chinese MiniPC came with official Windows. Had recommendation tp go through initial set up offline. Not that I kept Windows. I wiped it and put Fedora on it.

[–] morto@piefed.social 1 points 1 month ago

Around here, institutions are quire rigorous with that, so stores have to play by the book. Only very small shops can sell pirate software without getting caught

About the distros, Each brand seem to put a different one, and they're all weird. Mine came with some sort of modded debian with alternate repos, but was very impractical for use, and ended up installing fedora over it.

[–] Dagnet@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago (1 children)

They just expect everyone to pirate windows

[–] morto@piefed.social 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Exactly, but if we think about it, just putting some random well-established distro would be faster and cheaper than creating their weird modded versions or making contracts with weird firms. Maybe they want to avoid any unexpected legal issues?

[–] Dagnet@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Maybe it has some known vulnerabilities? The more reputable sellers I've seen around here (I'm also from. Brazil) just ship Ubuntu, it's usually the sketchier vendors with the weird distros

[–] morto@piefed.social 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Which brands have you seen shipping with ubuntu? I've seen vaio, samsung, asus and acer shipping with weird distros. They come like that even from the official stores.

[–] Dagnet@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Pretty sure Dell is ubuntu, dont remember others atm

[–] ms_lane@lemmy.world 39 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The problem there is Windows still has negative cost for OEMs due to all the bloatware they bundle.

They get paid for that McAfee and Epic Games icon.

[–] Die4Ever@retrolemmy.com 39 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

meanwhile on the Dell website

EDIT: $100 of that difference comes from Win11 requiring an SSD upgrade from 512GB to 1TB

[–] fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

What currency is that? Windows 11 home is $140 USD.

[–] Die4Ever@retrolemmy.com 19 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] sigmaklimgrindset@sopuli.xyz 14 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] kuberoot@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 1 month ago

I think that might be losing a $100 discount from the other configuration, possibly because they have excess smaller drives that don't meet win11 requirements?

[–] ReluctantMuskrat@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

That's crazy! I had no idea they were charging that much now. Thanks for sharing!

[–] Brkdncr@lemmy.world 18 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

They used to have agreements to make it difficult to do so. I don’t know if that’s still the case but it’s pretty awful. I think OEMs had to pay licenses for every machine shipped regardless if it had a windows license.

The other issue is that oems have a large amount of compatibility and support built up over the years for windows. They also know their customers can deal with Microsoft for “support” and ignore driver and support costs for whatever distro of Linux they were to choose.

Sure an OEM could lead the way and show everyone else the path to freedom but think of the shareholders

[–] Cricket@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 month ago

They used to have agreements to make it difficult to do so. I don’t know if that’s still the case but it’s pretty awful. I think OEMs had to pay licenses for every machine shipped regardless if it had a windows license.

Correct.

[–] saltesc@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

The Framework laptops have been selling out with backlog orders now. But with new models recently out, all the Linux ones sold out well before the Windows ones.

I think it just kind of goes to say, if you know a bit about computers, Linux is a go-to. Of course those that are a bit tech-savvy as well would just get a Windows one, clear it off and install the distro of their choice. Plus once upgrade is done, my OS and files are all there like nothing happened. Things like setting up Windows again on a new device or new install is like a full day task.

[–] adarza@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

they actually make money on many of those windows preinstalls due to all the bullshit they get paid to put on.

[–] imecth@fedia.io 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The fun part is that they can bundle an equal amount of bloatware on linux for even more revenue.

[–] Aeder@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The actually funny part is that they can't. Most of the bloatware is not available on Linux because it doesn't support it.

[–] imecth@fedia.io 2 points 1 month ago

I'm not sure what you mean... linux "supports" bloatware just fine, it's just that we don't have much of that kind of software (yet), and i'm sure they could get it all to run through winboat or somesuch if they really wanted to.