this post was submitted on 14 Aug 2026
283 points (99.6% liked)

politics

30831 readers
2324 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

General Atomics, the company that builds the electromagnetic aircraft launch system for the Ford-class carriers, said Trump’s decision to revert to steam “warrants careful reconsideration”. The company told the Journal its work on the new ship is nearly 50% complete and “changing course now would introduce significant cost, schedule, and integration risks”.

Senator Mark Kelly, an Arizona Democrat and a former astronaut, was more blunt in his reaction to the news.

“I’ve launched off the front of aircraft carriers hundreds of times, have a Master’s degree in aeronautical engineering, and am a test pilot and even I wouldn’t suggest to the Navy how to engineer specific systems on its ships,” Kelly wrote on social media. “Donald Trump should stick to what he knows best – ballrooms, bankruptcy, and bullshit.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Almacca@aussie.zone 3 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Dave Barry had a theory that Americans always elect the candidate with the best hair. He made that observation when Clinton was president, though. Not sure if that still holds up.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

best hair

Hm, interesting theory and sounds just like something he'd say, LOL.

Between Gore and W - not really sure there? Probably Gore, but then he did win the popular vote (and probably the election, too).

W and Kerry - Kerry definitely had the better hair. Maybe the election was rigged?

Obama and McCain - okay, I guess the theory holds.

Obama and Romney - hm, Romney probably had an edge there.

Hillary vs. Trump - LOL, Donvict's combover vs. Hillary? Pretty obvious there. I don't think people are matching up men/women on things like hair anyway. But she did win the popular vote, so....?

Trump vs. Biden - heh, well Biden had plugs or something done way back when and he didn't have much to work with. As ridiculous as Trump's hair is as a general rule, I could see how most people would come down on Trump's side. Maybe this is why Donvict thinks it is rigged? 🤣

Kamala vs. Trump - well Kamala definitely has the better hair.

Yeah, I'm not sure it holds up all that well. The height thing seems to work a bit better...with recent outliers being Kerry v. Bush.

I have to LOL at Wikipedia listing Donvict as 6' 3", BTW There is no fucking way that guy is that tall. How many men go from 6' 2" to 6' 3" later in life? I don't even believe the 6' 2", in fact I'm quite sure he is exactly the kind of man that would wear elevator shoes.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heights_of_presidents_and_presidential_candidates_of_the_United_States

[–] Almacca@aussie.zone 2 points 4 days ago

I appreciate you doing the research. Clearly, everything is all topsy-turvey and the rules don't apply any more.