Privacy

50436 readers

958 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn't great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
Don't promote proprietary software
Try to keep things on topic
If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
Be nice :)

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 6 years ago

MODERATORS

The Gemini Protocol in 2026: growing, but still not setting the Internet aflame (kevinboone.me)

submitted 3 days ago by SocialistVibes01@lemmy.ml to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

63 comments fedilink hide all child comments

With surveillance capitalism reaching it's peak in 2026/2027, is getting out the Web the only way for the privacy inclined user?

Will Gemini (or cousins) go the way of Linux? Or is it foverer condemned to go the way of Hurd

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] lambalicious@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

but it costs quite the resources to allow inline text-transformation

Skill issue. Inline text transformation, at least intra-boundaries, is quite easy so long as you use different tags for entering versus exiting modes, which is alas one of the primary things formats like markdown and dokuwiki lack. BBCode (remember that one) has it, tho.

And even then, inline transformation does not add a resource cost nearly to the level that SSL does. Why does Gemini even require TLS/SSL to begin with?

[–] DmMacniel@feddit.org 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Why does Gemini even require TLS/SSL to begin with?

to facilitate TOFU.

[–] lambalicious@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Like, how? I can get tofu right here from the food shop next block.

[–] DmMacniel@feddit.org 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Trust On First Use.

[–] lambalicious@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 23 hours ago

Isn't that the source of most internet problems?

Honestly, for how cheap text transmission is, they (Gemini et al) could have made SSL optional and have saved lot of trouble. Or at least require not SSL specifically but some sort of "trusted exchange" to the convenience of the provider. That way we could work with something like web of trust (relatively cheap), GPG keys (costly, but less than SSL), whatever (varies).