this post was submitted on 16 Aug 2026
87 points (96.8% liked)

Privacy

50414 readers
1081 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 

With surveillance capitalism reaching it's peak in 2026/2027, is getting out the Web the only way for the privacy inclined user?

Will Gemini (or cousins) go the way of Linux? Or is it foverer condemned to go the way of Hurd

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] boonhet@lemmy.zip 1 points 8 hours ago

reaching its peak

One can only hope.

[–] alt_xa_23@midwest.social 1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

I've been hosting a gemini capsule for a few years, but I hardly ever find myself using gemini. It's something I'd like to use more, but I kind of view it as more of a curiosity than a actually usable web substitute.

[–] FineCoatMummy@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 hours ago

more of a curiosity than a actually usable web substitute.

I kinda think they locked in the "curiosity" status when they decided not to have inline images. Feels like a step more than most ppl would do without.

[–] schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de 13 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I fail to understand the point of this.

If the goal is to be able to deliver documents without any JS, cookies, tracking, etc., then why not just deliver documents that way through the web? No one is forcing anyone to put those things on any website.

[–] dessalines@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Browsers are bigger than operating systems now. One of the points of gemini is to use a very restricted language and abilities, so that developers can create their own gemini browsers easily.

As it stands now, google exerts enormous control on the web because of how complicated it is to make a browser. Currently mozilla is google's only competitor in browser engines.

Browsers are bigger than operating systems now.

Not only that, there are web pages bigger than operating systems!

[–] Elw@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Exactly. This is one of the fundamental things that I never understood about Gemini. It's simply a "web" that doesn't support some of the features of the modern web that the author finds objectionable. I have no problem with anyone doing that or with the author's objections but they did a lot of work to do what could have simply been done with a specific set of tools and "rules" applied to the existing HTTP/HTML web.

  • Create a standard for what subset of HTML standards are supported and maybe define some headers for these pages to use to enable crawlers to identify them
  • Build some browsers that only support the standard subset
  • Build search engines that only index pages that contain the smolweb headers defined in the standard
  • ???
  • Profit
[–] schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 day ago

I thought the goal was precisely not profit? 😂😂😂

But yes, this is exactly what I meant.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] SocialistVibes01@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Through FTP, torrents, ADC, ED2K, or...?

[–] schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

"Web" means HTTP and HTML.

[–] SocialistVibes01@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I brain farted but I thought you had said the pages weren't important, so the same would be said about the hypertext transfer protocol. Now I see you were talking about the cruft.

[–] Allero@lemmy.today 25 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Honestly, I expect Gemini to remain a niche thing pretty much forever.

It does not offer what a regular user wants: a convenient, interactive, extensible, multipurpose Web. For most, it's incredibly boring and outdated. Even worse that it requires its own browser or translation through the local server.

At the same time, a lot of its advantages are specifically due to low adoption. What makes it more free and people-centric, for example, is exactly that barely anyone knows of its existence. Nothing stops one from infesting it much the same way regular Web is.

What would be curious, though, is the interaction between the concepts of this project and projects like Reticulum. We may need to develop alternative means of communication, including low-bandwith channels like LoRa, and for that, simple text-based sites are perfect.

[–] DmMacniel@feddit.org 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Honestly, I expect Gemini to remain a niche thing pretty much forever.

It does not offer what a regular user wants: a convenient, interactive, extensible, multipurpose Web. For most, it’s incredibly boring and outdated. Even worse that it requires its own browser or translation through the local server.

which is EXACTLY the point of Gemini. Focus is on the content. And well, you need a dedicated browser for the web as well.

[–] Allero@lemmy.today 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Sure. That's what makes it so appealing to the small minority that is actually into this.

It's not bad, and kudos to everyone keeping the project running, but widespread adoption is really not to be expected.

[–] SocialistVibes01@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

LoRa is proprietary. Shit would be as broken as FOSS in ARM and mobile. (Fuck Qualcomm!). Agreed on the rest.

[–] dessalines@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 day ago

While gemini is a great project, I personally think a better route would be to create a local or server service that converts and saves existing webpages to markdown, and local apps acting as markdown browsers utilizing it.

With that people could write simple browsers, as well as reduce spying and have static content viewable on all form factors.

Everything that's not static content (like the fediverse) already can have dedicated apps.

[–] mlfh@lm.mlfh.org 20 points 1 day ago (2 children)

It sucks that google changed its chatbot name from bard to gemini and drowned this cool project out in the process. It's a beautiful simple thing, and feels like the internet as it once was and should partially remain.

[–] onlyhalfminotaur@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

Yeah, although the Gemini crypto exchange predates both of them so it was a bad name to start with.

[–] bugbear@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 day ago

yeah, every time I see gemini (the protocol) posts online I need to check whether it's actually about the protocol or about the Google thing (and so just ignore it) 😞

[–] Melobol@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I loved their note:

Note: This article is about Gemini, the HTTP-like Internet protocol for document browsing, and not the large language model or the cryptocurrency of the same name. Nor it is about astrology.

The idea sounds interesting. I'm not against trying new things, but it seems kinda dead in the water?
For me forums were big part of my Internet history - but it is history. I'm not sure many people would choose to go back...

[–] FineCoatMummy@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I’m not sure many people would choose to go back…

I would.

There's a school of thought, which says for all of human history, we interacted with "about" a few hundred people. Sure, a few exceptions like the king or w/e, but for most ppl it held. Restoring that interaction scale, or sth close to it, may be the only way to prevent what becomes of FB, X, Reddit, and the rest.

In the olden days, there were small NON-federated, topic forums. I'm sure some sucked, that's fair. But very many were good. Right up until FB came and steamrolled that entire forum ecosystem into the dust of history. A few remain to this day tho, and they are STILL good. They are not the toxic dumpster fires of FB and the rest.

But I agree with you, Gemini is prob not going to grow beyond a minute niche.

[–] Melobol@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago

I think fediverse has the best shot at being better than existing big corpo crap.
To get away from trackers and ads you have to pay for that / run ot out of your basement.
People pay with their information for those 'freee' services.

[–] SocialistVibes01@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

This is not about nostalgia but to fight against surveillance weaponization and commoditification of what was once a tool for knowledge sharing. The old internet of bulletin boards and irc was essentially human, this thing we have now is something else. Did you chuckle at that chunck of text and not get where the author (as many of us) was standing from?

[–] Melobol@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago (8 children)

It feels like the good old Ivory Tower. "The let's lock ourselves in!" mentality never worked in changing the world for a beter place.
I'm not saying having principles and standing against slop/spyware/privacy nightmare is bad. But it feels a bit off to me.
I wish the best, and I want the best for the future.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] lattrommi@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 day ago

I recall learning about it around the time i started to learn Linux, when the pandamic first appeared. The introductory text/blog, or whatever it was, really resonated with me. I recall I kept reading and growing more and more excited and thinking I finally found a place on the internet that had people who thought like me, who hated the ad-choked, bot-death, politically-emotional wasteland and reality show the internet became.

I installed a client or three and ...nothing. I couldn't find anything. I didn't know what to look for, I'm not sure there even was a search or a way to know what content there was, beyond curated lists of page titles.

I tried learning how to make my own page and must have gotten confused or distracted and moved on.

I go back and try again every year or so but I think I lack something that helps me get into it more.

Maybe I need another user to befriend, a twin so to speak, hence the name of the protocol. Maybe I need a better internet connection (I'm poor, speed tops out at ~300kb/s, average is ~100kb/s). Maybe I just need another year or two.

[–] provectus@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Gemini is probably going to go the way of the Hurd sadly, IMO. It is a niche that only privacy enthusiasts and FOSS enthusiasts wish to succeed. The Hurd is doing pretty good for how little people are working on it. If anyone is interested checkout my community, which is centered around the GNU Hurd.

[–] cornshark@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

What do you mean? Gemini isn't open source, that's Gemma right?

[–] cornshark@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Oh sorry, checked the article, looks like someone named an internet protocol Gemini too

looks like someone named...

It's even funnier if you imagine it as the space program. Somehow, it's still muddling along in 2026 on a shoestring budget that slipped below the notice of NASA bean counters, but it hasn't got enough attention to be noticed on the internet.

[–] provectus@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 day ago

Yeah it sucks that google coined the name after their ai chatbot. The first thing that comes to everyone when they hear the name gemini is that bot.

[–] ambitiousslab@feddit.uk 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I've checked out Gemini a couple of times and find it a fun project.

In my opinion though, we gain more by participating in the wider web. There are a plethora of small web websites out there - it's only difficult to find them. Blogrolls/blogrings and dedicated search engines like Marginalia help with this.

This also lets everyone have a more granular definition of what's important to them: lack of javascript, minimal page size, lack of styling, full-text RSS feeds, compatibility with text-mode browsers etc. Everyone can pick and choose what they value without having to hash out agreement over the spec.

[–] SocialistVibes01@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

The current Web is a lost battle, the demon won't ever go back to the bottle. Pandora is dead.

[–] daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago (4 children)

It's fun. It has a few rough edges I would love to be fixed.

The format would make you think that's perfect for phone browsing, it's just text so ot should adapt easy to small screens. Well, I've found too many capsules that write newlines for formsting text based on a traditional desktop expected screen size. I think there should be more geminiettiquete about not making the format of the page expect any aspect ratio or size.

On the web we have css to fix that and do fancy formats that can adapt everywhere. In gemini there's no css so publishers should avoid trying to aim for a hardcoded expected aspect. As that could break the viewing experience for many users.

Other that that it's quite fun to read some of the little pages out there.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] theherk@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

sourcehut hosts it free and makes publishing dead simple. You just push a tarball, and Bob’s your mother’s brother.

load more comments
view more: next ›