this post was submitted on 23 Nov 2023
116 points (97.5% liked)

Programming

17364 readers
195 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Rules

  • Follow the programming.dev instance rules
  • Keep content related to programming in some way
  • If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev



founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Many of us write opensource code in a void: nobody ever looks at it, uses it nor reviews it. We are the only users and authors.

In order to improve, where can we get our code reviewed? I don't mean professionally, just from like-minded individuals.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] kassuro@feddit.de 14 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Would love something like this, but it's very hard to get such a community working. Most of the time there will be way more people wanting a review of their code than people wanting to put in the work and review something.

Maybe some kind of point system could work. Like one needs to review at least two times before you can get your work reviewed.

[–] lhamil64@programming.dev 9 points 11 months ago (3 children)

One issue I can see with the points system is that people could just approve it with a "Looks good to me!" without even looking at the code. Or just looking at a small portion of the code.

[–] coloredgrayscale@programming.dev 4 points 11 months ago

Also bike shedding. Simple stuff may get many people willing to review / argue about how you should have used A over B, or even C

Big / complicated projects - forget it. Especially if if they would need major refactoring.

[–] kassuro@feddit.de 1 points 11 months ago

Yeah that's definitely a possibility. It's really a tricky topic to build a review community. One could try other approaches like dedicated volunteer reviewers. But if you look at exorcism, that will become hard to manage for languages with huge demand.

A system where everyone also needs to review is definitely better. Especially since everyone also learns reading other peoples code.

[–] threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.works 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Could there be a way to award the points proportionally, based on how useful the feedback is?

[–] kassuro@feddit.de 3 points 11 months ago

But who decides that? If the person who requested it can do this, you only need a friend to abuse the system and give each other a few extra points.

Maybe a open point history could help with this and users moderate themselves with this.

[–] Ategon@programming.dev 3 points 11 months ago (2 children)

with that there would need some way for people to have things to initially review to get the community started. Could do something like after the first 3 posts the point system goes into effect

[–] kassuro@feddit.de 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

True, it's not a fleshed out idea haha. But starting with a few points would work.

Could actually be a cool in it self, wish I had time for something like that.

[–] vrek@programming.dev 1 points 11 months ago

Something like c sharp acedemy would be kinda cool. Basically do some beginner projects with good code reviews you get a "belt". That belt allows you to review the beginner projects as you work on intermediate projects. Then you complete those and get another belt that let's you do advanced projects and review the intermediate projects others submitted.

[–] subignition@kbin.social 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Kinda sounds like a format similar to Stack Exchange might work

[–] RoToRa@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 11 months ago

There actually is a Stack Exchange community for code reviews: https://codereview.stackexchange.com/