this post was submitted on 27 Aug 2026
1025 points (98.8% liked)

Work Reform

17499 readers
1470 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] Little_mouse@lemmy.ca 26 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Nope, time and again it is shown that the most effective way to house people without homes is to give them homes. By providing no-strings housing first, you make all the other issues easier to deal with.

We've also shown time and again that the strongest predictor for unhoused populations is the cost of property. And at the same time the number of empty homes in a lot of the western world greatly outnumber the number of unhoused.

But giving homes to the unhoused or doing anything to lower property values or prevent the rich from hoarding property would make the wealthy elite upset.

[โ€“] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 week ago

By providing no-strings housing first, you make all the other issues easier to deal with.

First, absolutely, but not in isolation.

If that person doesn't also get some help dealing with the issues that led to their homelessness, they're likely to end up back on the street in the future.