Privacy

50717 readers

860 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn't great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
Don't promote proprietary software
Try to keep things on topic
If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
Be nice :)

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 6 years ago

MODERATORS

369

Florida bans Flock cameras and other license plate readers from state highways (www.nbcnews.com)

submitted 1 day ago by FineCoatMummy@sh.itjust.works to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

45 comments fedilink hide all child comments

In stopped clock is right twice a day news, Florida is moving to ban Flocks from state highways.

Aside from Florida, there is a bunch of momentum all around the US now. Some cities just moved to another ALPR vendor like Axon. That sucks ofc. But many have eliminated ALPR entirely too, after citizens spoke out! Some cities had a constant stream of ppl speaking at city council meetings about it, months on end, dozens of ppl in every meeting.

It's harder to deal with Flocks on private property. Like Home Depot and Lowes. A city gov terminating its own contract, doesn't stop Home Depot. I dream of a coordinated, nation-wide boycott of co's that put private Flocks in their lots. And letting them know exactly why.

Let's keep the anti ALPR momentum going. It's starting to see results. And don't fall into the illogic of thinking it's not perfect, therefore it's useless.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] krolden@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They have facial recognition surveillance inside so what's the difference

[–] Ebby@lemmy.ssba.com 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I'm aware of the lawsuit suggesting home Depot is using self checkout cameras to scan and log biometric data. I am waiting for that to play out in court however.

If true, then yes, throw the book at them. It is likely video is sent to remote processing hardware that does violate the law.

However, I'll point out that is an assumption as the plaintiff nearly saw a rectangle around his head which doesn't necessarily indicate anything beyond object identification; basic technology built into cameras for decades now.

In this case Home Depot themselves somewhat implied legitimacy to the complaint in their defense of it. Smooth move guys.

[–] krolden@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I don't know of any lawsuit but just assume any store with the resources to do such a thing is doing it.

Also there's no reason they shouldn't be allowed to do that. It's their store. As long as they aren't giving free access to LEO or feds or whomever they can do it all they want.

[–] Ebby@lemmy.ssba.com 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

There are notification requirements if they use the technology in store. The tech it's self is allowed.

[–] krolden@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Who says they need to notify you?

[–] Ebby@lemmy.ssba.com 1 points 47 minutes ago

Illinois law.

BIPA, enacted by the Illinois Legislature, regulates the collection, use, and storage of biometric identifiers such as facial geometry scans. It requires private entities to develop publicly available written policies for retaining and destroying biometric data and to obtain informed, written consent from individuals before collecting their biometric information.