this post was submitted on 06 Sep 2026
9 points (71.4% liked)

Explain Like I'm Five

22240 readers
2 users here now

Simplifying Complexity, One Answer at a Time!

Rules

  1. Be respectful and inclusive.
  2. No harassment, hate speech, or trolling.
  3. Engage in constructive discussions.
  4. Share relevant content.
  5. Follow guidelines and moderators' instructions.
  6. Use appropriate language and tone.
  7. Report violations.
  8. Foster a continuous learning environment.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

They lack any meaningful design in comparison to other currencies, since all denominations stick to mainly black and white designs with slight hints of color as they've remained the same for a long time. Why won't USD switch to Polymer bills (it was first unveiled in Australia) like they've done in the UK or UAE for example.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Vanth@reddthat.com 22 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Infrastructure costs would be notable. Vending machines, ATMs, and other money-receiving machines are calibrated for current cotten/linen bills.

Impetus. Changing to polymer bills would take political will and we can't manage anything productive atm.

Personally, I don't want Trump to drive the change because he would end up putting himself on the bills, and other distasteful characters from history.

[–] NightOps@nord.pub 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Trump

he would end up putting himself on the bills

The closest example of this is from the Chinese Yuan, where Mao Zedong is depicted in all denominations. (So, it'll be the same if Trump decided to replace current issued $ into a new series with him on it).

0d1PTWGNbOS1dfl.jpg

[–] Korkki@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's not the same as with the dollar and US presidents. Mao kinda is the face and father of the modern China. (While Trump is most likely the face of the end of America as a superpower) Also neither PRC (nor ROC) are not putting fucking Emperor Pu Yis face on their bills, since everybody alt least agree to make that much of a break from from the old empire. Who do do they really have? Sun Yat-sen? All the chairmen after Mao, even Xi are kinda a smalltimers compared to him. Mao is also a symbol as much as he was a leader. It's literally the 'people's money'. The party, the people and the ideology have a tight grip on the balls of capital.

[–] HakFoo@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Up to 1990, PRC banknotes had different portraits. I suspect many of them were "representatives" for different types of labourer or ethnic groups rather than idolizing a single figure.

For example https://en.numista.com/211574

The 100-yuan of the series features Mao with three other early leaders of the republic, but the lower notes are representatives.

[–] jqubed@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I don’t remember for certain and I’m not taking the time to look it up, but I think there are some legal restrictions as well? I’m guessing that is included in your Impetus paragraphs, since it would require congressional direction to change things.

The Treasury or whoever has actually redesigned the bills quite a bit in my lifetime and they’re more colorful than they used to be, but I think they’ve done what they can while sticking within legal parameters. Given how much some people refer to other nations’ currencies as “Monopoly Money” despite some obvious benefits I’m not holding my breath for significant changes for a while yet.

I’m glad we’re finally getting rid of the penny at least. I used to be a proponent of the $1 coin, but having spent some time in Canada and Europe I actually find $/€/£ coins annoying and heavy in actual practice.