I get that that's a strong word to use but unless this was bullshit, I stand by it being irrefutable.

The paper also examined court documents detailing the evidence that was to have been presented had Malone responded and a trial ensued. One item listed was a laboratory blood test that concluded with over 99% certainty that Bell's father was either Malone or a brother of Malone.

Bell's mother was 13 at the time she gave birth. So I mean, there's I guess a less than 1% chance that Malone isn't actually a pedophile. But his unwillingness to submit to the DNA test coupled with there being an already over 99% chance anyway, is pretty irrefutable to me.