this post was submitted on 10 Sep 2026
766 points (95.6% liked)

Work Reform

17521 readers
2308 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Serinus@lemmy.world -2 points 2 days ago (2 children)

"A bunch" is roughly three. Sinema, Fetterman, and, uh... I'm sure there's one more.

It's easier to stop things than to pass things. You'll notice Republicans aren't getting a lot done right now, exactly. At least not through Congress.

They're doing so many blatantly illegal things, largely with the blessing of the DoJ and the Supreme Court. But they can't get the SAVE Act through to stop us from voting.

It turns out every bit matters.

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Jeffries, Schumer, Pelosi, Kaine, Booker… pretty much anyone not in the squad or otherwise on the AIPAC tiddy

[–] Serinus@lemmy.world -5 points 1 day ago

The neolibs are not responsible for the majority of our problems.

Their biggest crimes are Israel and not being aggressive enough on changes. They're not the ones preventing most of the legislation we've tried to pass, such as the public option with the ACA.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (2 children)

“A bunch” is roughly three. Sinema, Fetterman, and, uh…

If you can't name more than two Senators... Jesus, dude. Maybe start with Henry Cuellar and Bob Menendez. Ritchie Torres. Elissa Slotkin. Eric Swalwell. Josh Gottheimer. Do I really need to make you the full list?

[–] 0tan0d@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

Cory big pharma bitchboy Nooker

[–] AWistfulNihilist@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Whenever there is a democratic majority, just enough Democrats will turn to make any actual change impossible, like a public option with Obama. Or when the blue dog Democrats fucked healthcare reform under Clinton. It's happened every time and will continue to happen because the ratchet effect is a feature that always ends in facism and oligarchy, which is where you make your real money.

[–] Natanael@infosec.pub -2 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (2 children)

Is that why Biden got more progressive change through than any prior president despite record breaking political resistance?

You need break the dependency on the idiots who talk about fake "bipartisanship", like Manchin

When get only get small majorities, these damn idiots gets a say, you need to make those dumbasses irrelevant

https://edition.cnn.com/2024/03/21/politics/joe-manchin-nominees-bipartisan-support

[–] AWistfulNihilist@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

This is adorable!

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 3 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Biden got more progressive change through

He did not. He got more "bipartisan" changes, and we've lowered the bar for what that means

[–] Natanael@infosec.pub 1 points 6 hours ago (1 children)
[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

Kutter points out that “Joe Biden is the first president in recent memory to press for significantly higher taxes on the very rich.”

Individual tax rates did not change under Biden

This couple with the tangible benefits provided through his America Recovery Act, the Building Back Better Initiative and Infrastructure Investment Act; could help Democrats in 2024 among swing voters

None of these were progressive. They were all tax benefits and grants to big business, specifically in the tech industry. And these businesses were largely aligned with the Trump coalition.

Also, Jesus Christ, please include a "Jump to Recipe" on this article so I can find your points without an hour of scrolling.

[–] Natanael@infosec.pub 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)
[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 1 points 21 minutes ago

Biden’s Department of Labor reopened the issue and proposed a rule at the end of August that would push up that cutoff by nearly $20,000 — to $55,000. The draft regulation, which still needs to be finalized

No

[–] Serinus@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The ratchet effect is real, but it's because when the Dems have a majority they're relying on West Virginia. Republicans kiss the ring or they're kicked from politics, just look at Ted Cruz.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

when the Dems have a majority they’re relying on West Virginia

They're relying on a billionaire scion of a coal dynasty. Plenty of working class labor friendly people in WV. But the Dem Senate committee won't touch any of them.

[–] AWistfulNihilist@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

Yeah it's always something, and it's always gonna be something. And that thing is oligarchy.