this post was submitted on 14 Sep 2026
1048 points (98.1% liked)

Technology

88041 readers
4362 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] lena@gregtech.eu 27 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Thankfully it's not so dangerous

[–] Awooooooga@lemmy.world 1 points 13 hours ago

Head in the sand just like climate change deniers

[–] shawn1122@sh.itjust.works 3 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

""I resigned from Anthropic today... Neither company is acting responsibly. They are racing straight to self-improving superintelligence and gambling with our lives. The people building AI earnestly believe that it could kill us all by the end of the decade. This is not a marketing stunt... many executives couch their phrasing in the press to sound sensible, but I hear the same people express fear privately."

Jacob Coxen senior researcher at Anthropic, previously at OpenAI

"Jacob is correct here — we really do earnestly believe AI could kill all humans. I personally think it is >10% within the next decade. I believe Anthropic is trying its best, but we do not yet have a plan to solve alignment for superintelligence and are not clearly on track to."

Evan Hubinger, Anthropic alignment lead

[–] qqq@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This is such a wild take to be getting this many upvotes. If nothing happened in LLM development from this day forward they'd still be absurdly dangerous: both in an information security context and a social engineering context.

Lemmy is absolutely head in the sand about LLMs and it is wild. You can dislike LLMs and acknowledge their capabilities [and limitations] at the same time.

[–] darvocet@infosec.pub 0 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (1 children)

You and I are the only ones apparently.

[–] qqq@lemmy.world 1 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (1 children)

LLMs entering the world have revealed two very different types of crazies and I'm starting to think they're everywhere. It's quite tiring to have to constantly say "no they're not useless" and "no they're not super god" instead of engage with an actually interesting discussion.

[–] darvocet@infosec.pub 1 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

I don't really understand why lemmy thinks what it thinks on this one. To me it's undeniable that it's improving fast and it's capable today of replacing a great many current job roles. Putting our heads in the sand isn't going to make it go away.

[–] qqq@lemmy.world 1 points 23 hours ago

Right, and regardless of sci-fi future potentials, there is a current reality and we're in it and only have so much time to affect it's evolution. All of these likely intelligent people completely ignoring reality isn't helping define and construct the world we want tomorrow.

[–] BlueOysterCultist@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago

I wouldn’t say that, the amount of vulnerabilities it’s discovering (and capable of exploiting) is frightening