Entrepreneur

0 readers

1 users here now

Rules

No Personal Attacks - criticism of ideas is allowed, attacking people is not.
Self Posts Only - links can only provide supplementary material. Your post must contain enough content to have a discussion.
No “How To Get Rich Quick” posts - This community is not about making a quick buck. Posts asking the community how to make $X, without making specific reference to a reasonable idea, are not tolerated.
Avoid unprofessional communication - Please treat fellow entrepreneurs like respected coworkers, label conversations if NSFW and avoid deliberate provocations.

Please feel free to provide evidence-based best practices, share a micro-victory, discuss strategy and concepts with a frame work, ask for feedback, and create professional conversation. Treat every post as if you're at work and representing the best version of yourself.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

communick@indiehackers.space

Is Chat GPT actually worth the effort? (alien.top)

submitted 1 year ago by guymclarenza@alien.top to c/entrepreneur@indiehackers.space

25 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I am what is known as an early adopter, I try all the new shit, I was on Twitter early and got banned for being a Nazi or something when if you said anything anyone disagreed with you were a fascist.
Chat GPT is something that I have been playing with, 3.5 is as dumb as a plank, If OpenAI wanted to convince me that upgrading to 4 was a good idea they would have made 3.5 interesting enough that it was useful for more than creating outlines.
Here are my concerns.
Chat GPT cannot count, it cannot follow instructions and rehashes the same content in numerous areas, I tried writing blogs about photography, web development, carpentry and more. As a brainstorming device it's good, to get an outline it's accep[table, but as far as trusting it with creating original content that needs as much effort to edit and fact check as it would take me to do it from scratch anyway.
In the ever changing, fast paced world yadda yadda is one of it's gotos. I wonder how many people are posting exactly the same AI generated shite, because they can't be arsed to actually check it.
IT's a boon for the spam content creator, but for the person serious about his business< I am not convinced, Convince me.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] guymclarenza@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

and rewritten for a photographer

As a seasoned photographer always on the lookout for cutting-edge tools, my experience with ChatGPT 3.5 left me underwhelmed. Its limitations in precision and inability to grasp instructions made it more of a brainstorming aid than a reliable content creator for my photography blogs.
Concerns about content repetition and the generic nature of responses lingered. In the fast-paced world of photography, it seemed like many might be churning out similar AI-generated content without bothering to verify it. While ChatGPT served well for creating outlines, I hesitated to trust it with crafting original and meticulously fact-checked photography content.
Now, considering the potential upgrade to GPT-4, I'm curious about whether it addresses these issues. Can it truly provide a more accurate, context-aware, and creative approach to photography content? Does it understand the nuances of the field and produce diverse, original outputs? If GPT-4 proves to be a reliable tool, it could be a game-changer for serious photographers aiming for high-quality, unique content in the ever-evolving photography landscape.
I'm open to being convinced. How does GPT-4 enhance the content creation process for photographers, ensuring it aligns with the standards of those deeply invested in their craft?