this post was submitted on 25 Nov 2023
1 points (100.0% liked)
NBA - Main
15 readers
1 users here now
Game analysis, highlights and everything else that is happening in the NBA.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
They wouldn't have. The perception at the time was that LeBron was in their heads and that they had nothing for him, Kyrie had also just badly outplayed Steph in the NBA Finals and the Cavs looked like the tougher and more resilient team.
No, they weren't. It took them injuries to Kevin Love and Kyrie to beat the Cavs in 6 the year before and they lost in 2016. You also are completely ignoring the psychological edge the Cavs had after that win and the fact that the Warriors almost didn't even make it that far, needing a historical chokejob by the Thunder to get to the Finals.
Also no. The Bulls won 141 games games in 2 seasons, regardless if the Warriors had won it or not, Chicago still had the most dominant 2 year stretch in NBA history. Chicago also obliterated the '96 and '97 playoffs, losing 7 games TOTAL in those 2 postseasons, the Warriors lost 7 games in the 2016 WCF and NBA Finals alone.
This is some blatant revisionist history, there was not a soul on EARTH in 2016 that thought the Warriors were the favourites before they got Durant, everyone thought that LeBron was about to spank them for years to come.