this post was submitted on 21 Oct 2026
619 points (98.6% liked)

Technology

89000 readers
2659 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 140 points 2 days ago (2 children)

The likely motive:

“My thought was they could keep it in their back pocket to invalidate any [election] results they don’t like,” one of the former officials told ProPublica. “This goes against everything CISA represents.”

[–] LillyPip@lemmy.ca 55 points 2 days ago

Well, this and to exploit them. Like:

Step 1: exploit vulnerabilities.
Step 2: accuse opponent of exploiting them, lock them up.
Step 3: profit

[–] artyom@piefed.social 39 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Well that was...unexpected. Surely the more likely scenario is that they exploit the hack to change the results?

[–] FrostyTheDoo@lemmy.world 52 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That's a much more findable paper trail than "holy shit we just found a vulnerability we didn't know about, that means someone might have cheated so we have to invalidate the results"

Instead of "whoopsie this thing says I won even though everyone you talk to says they voted against me"

[–] a_non_monotonic_function@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago (2 children)

His only real move in elections is to scream cheating. This is exactly what he wants to just declare the elections fake.

[–] Furbag@pawb.social 2 points 20 hours ago

Yeah, I wouldn't put it past him to cheat since he was caught cheating before, but I do believe the reason the Trump admin asked to keep any vulnerabilities under wraps is not so they could exploit them, but so they could delay the announcement of finding them after the results came in and invalidate the results if they ended up losing.

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 9 points 1 day ago (2 children)

He has two moves: to scream cheating, and to cheat himself.

[–] Colloidal@programming.dev 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

If he cheats, he still leaves the presidency. If he screams cheating, he can weasel a new election and provisory government. He doesn't care about the party either.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 1 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Why do you think he still leaves if he cheats? Who's going to find out, and who's going to hold him accountable. Even if it's discovered, he just yells that he's framed, and if that fails he yells that he had to, and if that fails then he just yells that he's allowed to, and there's nothing the government, under his control, is going to do to stop that.

[–] Colloidal@programming.dev 1 points 14 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 1 points 8 hours ago

First, this is the mid-terms. That doesn't come into effect for two more years. Second, when has the law stopped him before? I've still seen nothing to imply he's not running again.

[–] artyom@piefed.social 7 points 1 day ago

"Every accusation is an admission"

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 day ago

Or they'll deliberately introduce a hack that appears to benefit the Dems, in order to claim they've been cheated.