VOTE ,VOTE ,VOTE
this post was submitted on 21 Oct 2026
274 points (98.2% liked)
Technology
88946 readers
4038 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
all that russian bloatware is installed in GOP controlled machines.
I don't really understand why voting machines are complicated enough that there are feasible vulnerabilities. They have one job, and it's to count. It really shouldn't be too tough for a crack team of competent devs to write the software required to make them work securely. No network access, a memory safe language, and strict business rules should be relatively trivial to setup. Double that will external audits and you've got yourself a stew.
Answer: confidentiality of the vote
Problem is we buy these things from the lowest bidder
The likely motive:
“My thought was they could keep it in their back pocket to invalidate any [election] results they don’t like,” one of the former officials told ProPublica. “This goes against everything CISA represents.”
Well, this and to exploit them. Like:
Step 1: exploit vulnerabilities.
Step 2: accuse opponent of exploiting them, lock them up.
Step 3: profit
Well that was...unexpected. Surely the more likely scenario is that they exploit the hack to change the results?
That's a much more findable paper trail than "holy shit we just found a vulnerability we didn't know about, that means someone might have cheated so we have to invalidate the results"
Instead of "whoopsie this thing says I won even though everyone you talk to says they voted against me"
His only real move in elections is to scream cheating. This is exactly what he wants to just declare the elections fake.
Do vulnerabilities in voting software typically get disclosed to the public? Is there a CVE list somewhere that I can browse?
Just open source the code, that's the best way to help validate the systems used. Though, no telling if they'd be modified, update/patched, or using a compromised fork, so who knows....