this post was submitted on 26 Oct 2026
226 points (99.1% liked)

Technology

89127 readers
5474 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] dhork@lemmy.world 30 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

It depends on how close you are to retiring. If you are more than 10 years away, you are probably better off doing nothing differently. Look at the inevitable dip as a buying opportunity.

Even if you are close, you still need to be careful. Yes, the market is probably due for a 40% haircut at some point. But if it takes another 3 years to get there, then the market might increase more than that before then.

There are funds that track the entire S&P 500, but omit those 7 large Tech companies, and their performance has consistently lagged behind the whole index. If you thought years ago that the Tech sector would be do for a correction and backed out of those 7 companies while keeping the rest, you would be objectively worse off.

[–] DarkDarkHouse@lemmy.sdf.org 11 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Buying a dip is still trying to time the market. If you have a view then you implement it, if you have no view then you'd probably dollar cost average into broad indices. I think you can look at your personal stake, what you can afford to lose with your horizon, and then make any necessary changes to limit the downside. Like you say, you might need to give up some possible gains.

[–] Fallibilist@feddit.uk 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Actually buying the dip is timing the market, not trying to. You really can't go wrong with that. It becomes an issue is when you don't invest because you're waiting for the dip.

[–] blitzen@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 days ago

I what I mean by timing the market is reallocating based on what I think may happen. Simply increasing contributions (if I can) when the market craters might technically be timing it, but differently than what I mean.

[–] meltedcheese@c.im 1 points 2 days ago

@DarkDarkHouse Take care of the downside and the upside will take care of itself.