this post was submitted on 26 Oct 2026
125 points (93.7% liked)

politics

31539 readers
2451 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 7 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

Right? Don't they love them some Candace Owens?

[–] Catma@lemmy.world 9 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

I thought Candace was in the MAGA dog house for going way to overt over Jews over the last year or so?

And isnt she still be sued by the Macrons for insinuating Brigitte was a man all along?

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

Candace is currently i guess 'going through it'...

...because she is describing everyone who is suspicious of the 'data privacy' app she does commercials for, which has ties to the NSA, Mossad, and whose CEO/frontman is 'ex' CIA...

... she is describing people who find that sketchy, as conspiracy theorists.

The Charlie Kirk conspiracies were largely popular with her crowd, she basically/arguably was the singular person most responsible for tearing MAGA in half, basically white/christian supremacists/nativists on one side, pro perma warmachine + digital panopticon zionist neocons on the other.

For a while, she was relatively very powerful as basically the prime figure / leader of the anti-Zionist/anti-Jewish* half of MAGA that became that half largely because of a split she largely caused.

*(we have to note here that right wingers are seemingly largely incapable of understanding that jew != zionist, so for them, they are basically always both anti zionist and just actually anti-semitic at the same time.)

But now, she is losing a good chunk of her side (white supremacists/christian theofascists) because she is calling everyone who questions her own ties to the permawarmachine zionist necons... a ridiculous conspiracy theorist.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 2 points 22 hours ago

Maybe? It's hard to keep track of all the various squabbling between all the con artists running a grift on maga.

As far as I know, she's still running whatever show she had. { searches }

Oh yeah, guess she got fired from Daily Wire, but YT carries her. For some reason, I kept hearing all this nonsense about how liberal Big Tech was, and how so many conservatives were so very "cancelled".

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Candace_Owens#Post-Daily_Wire_career

Following her firing from The Daily Wire, Owens began a new YouTube channel, running it independently.[72] It had over 6 million subscribers as of June 2026.

[–] PattyMcB@lemmy.world 6 points 22 hours ago

They can't be racist of they have black friends!!!

I would hope the /s isn't necessary.